Atkins and Hunt (No 2)

Case [2015] FamCA 707


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

ATKINS & HUNT (NO. 2) [2015] FamCA 707
FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – Whether the Court has jurisdiction under section 83 to hear the wife’s application to vary a spousal maintenance order – Where the order sought to be varied was made on a final basis and is no longer in force – No jurisdiction found – Where the wife then sought leave to amend the application so that the orders are sought under section 74 – Where the matter is under appeal and the trial judge dismissed the wife’s stay application - Leave to amend dismissed.
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 44, 80, 83
Taylor v Taylor (1979) FLC 90-674
In re VGM Holdings Limited [1941] 3 All ER 417
Cameron & Cole (1944) 68 CLR 571
APPLICANT: Ms Atkins
RESPONDENT: Mr Hunt
FILE NUMBER: SYC 425 of 2012
DATE DELIVERED: 21 August 2015
PLACE DELIVERED: Sydney
PLACE HEARD: Sydney
JUDGMENT OF: McClelland J
HEARING DATE: 21 August 2015

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Othen
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Paltos Milevski Family Lawyers
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr Lethbridge SC
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Sexton Family Law

Orders

  1. The Initiating Application filed on 14 July 2015 is dismissed.

  2. The listings on 7 October 2015 and 23 November 2015 be vacated.

  3. The wife’s oral application for leave to amend the Initiating Application filed on 14 July 2015 to include an application for orders pursuant to section 74 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) is dismissed.

  4. The husband is to file and serve any application for costs, together with supporting material and the husband’s submissions, within 14 days.

  5. The wife is to file and serve any response to the husband’s application for costs, together with any supporting material and submissions, within 28 days.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Atkins & Hunt (No.2) has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY

FILE NUMBER: SYC 425 of 2012

Ms Atkins

Applicant

And

Mr Hunt

Respondent

EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. In this matter, an Initiating Application was filed by the wife on 14 July 2015 for orders under section 83 of the Family Law Act1975 (Cth) (“the Act”) dealing with modification of spousal maintenance orders. Section 83(1)(f) of the Act provides that, “if there is in force an order (whether made before after the commencement of this Act) with respect to maintenance of a party to a marriage”, the Court has power to “… vary the order, so as to increase or decrease any amount ordered to paid or any other manner.” 

  2. The orders sought to be varied by the wife’s application under section 83 were orders made by Aldridge J on 4 December 2014. In particular, Aldridge J ordered, in Order 6, that “upon completion of the sale of the [B Street] property”, which was a property owned…

Continue reading Atkins and Hunt (No 2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Atkins and Hunt (No 2) [2015] FamCA 707
Case
[2015] FamCA 707
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Atkins and Hunt (No 2)*, McClelland J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application by the wife to amend her initiating application to include orders sought under section 74 of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). The husband sought the dismissal of the wife's initiating application and the vacation of scheduled listings.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the wife should be granted leave to amend her initiating application to include an application for orders under section 74 of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). This required the court to consider the nature of the proposed amendments and their impact on the existing proceedings.

McClelland J dismissed the wife's oral application for leave to amend the initiating application. The court also dismissed the initiating application itself and vacated the listings. The husband was ordered to file and serve any application for costs within 14 days, with the wife to file and serve any response within 28 days thereafter.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The Initiating Application filed on 14 July 2015 is dismissed.

2.

The listings on 7 October 2015 and 23 November 2015 be vacated.

3.

The wife’s oral application for leave to amend the Initiating Application filed on 14 July 2015 to include an application for orders pursuant to section 74 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) is dismissed.

4.

The husband is to file and serve any application for costs, together with supporting material and the husband’s submissions, within 14 days.

5.

The wife is to file and serve any response to the husband’s application for costs, together with any supporting material and submissions, within 28 days.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.