Atienza (Migration)

Case

[2018] AATA 5559

16 November 2018


Atienza (Migration) [2018] AATA 5559 (16 November 2018)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Fahd Hussein Atienza

CASE NUMBER:  1831986

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):           BCC2018/120969

MEMBER:Mila Foster

DATE:16 November 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:

·cl.500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

Statement made on 16 November 2018 at 12:09pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – enrolment –evidence of enrolment before the Tribunal – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 1.03; Schedule 2, cls 500.111, 500.211

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 18 October 2018 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 9 January 2018. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.

  3. The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl.500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) because he had not provided evidence of enrolled in an acceptable course of study.

  4. For the following reasons, I have concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  5. The criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are set out in Part 500 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations. The primary criteria in cl.500.211 to cl.500.218 must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria. The issue in the present case is whether the applicant satisfies cl.500.211.

  6. Clause 500.211 relevantly requires that at the time of this decision the applicant is enrolled in a course of study: cl.500.211(a). The applicant does not claim to meet any of the alternative criteria in cl.500.211. ‘Course of study’ is relevantly defined in cl.500.111 of the Regulations as a ‘full-time registered course’. ‘Registered course’ is defined in r.1.03 of the Regulations as a course of education or training provided by an institution, body or person that is registered, under Division 3 of Part 2 of the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000, to provide the course to overseas students.

  7. The Tribunal has received an Overseas Student Confirmation-of-Enrolment issued by the Department of Education and Training which indicates that the applicant is enrolled in a course of study as defined in the Act and Regulations which commences on 30 January 2019 and ends on 20 December 2019. I am therefore satisfied that at the time of this decision the applicant is enrolled in a course of study and accordingly that cl.500.211 is met. The appropriate course is thus to remit the application for the visa to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa.

    DECISION

  8. The Tribunal remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:

    ·cl.500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    Mila Foster
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Remedies

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0