FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Askernish Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 400
CORPORATIONS – voluntary administration – application for an order extending time to reconvene adjourned second meeting of creditors – whether the court has power to extend time – factors in exercise of discretion – liberty to apply granted.
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 421(2), 436E, 439A, 439B(2), 447A and 1322(4)
Cawthorn v Keira Constructions Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 337 cited
Mann v Abruzzi Sports Club Ltd (1994) 12 ACLC 137 cited
Milankov Nominees Pty Ltd v Roycol Ltd (1994) 52 FCR 378 citedRe Double V Marketing Pty Ltd(in administration) (1995) 16 ACSR 498 cited
Re Locm Pty Ltd (1997) 79 FCR 35 cited
Re Old Papa’s Holdings Ltd; Ex parte Wallman (2001) 24 WAR 229 cited
Re Regency South Steyne Investments Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1546 cited
IN THE MATTER OF ASKERNISH PTY LTD (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed) (ACN 008 806 773)
W34 OF 2004LEE J
13 FEBRUARY 2004
PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
W34 OF 2004
IN THE MATTER OF ASKERNISH PTY LTD (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed)
(ACN 008 806 773)ANTHONY MICHAEL TRAVERS
PLAINTIFFJUDGE:
LEE J
DATE OF ORDER:
13 FEBRUARY 2004
WHERE MADE:
PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The time within which the plaintiff may reconvene the adjourned meeting of creditors of Askernish Pty Ltd (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed) (ACN 008 806 773) (“the company”) be extended to 22 April 2004.
2.Leave be reserved to any person claiming to be interested (including the Australian Securities Investment Commission, any creditor, or the receiver and manager) to vary these orders on 48 hours notice to the plaintiff.
3.The plaintiff’s costs of the application be costs in the administration of the company.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
W34 OF 2004
IN THE MATTER OF ASKERNISH PTY LTD (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed)
(ACN 008 806 773)ANTHONY MICHAEL TRAVERS
PLAINTIFF
JUDGE:
LEE J
DATE:
13 FEBRUARY 2004
PLACE:
PERTH
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
LEE J:
By originating process filed on 12 February 2004 the plaintiff (“the administrator”) applied for an order pursuant to s 447A and/or s 1322(4)(d) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (“the Act”) extending the time within which the administrator may reconvene the adjourned second meeting of creditors of Askernish Pty Ltd (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed) (ACN 008 806 773) (“Askernish”).
The relevant facts may be shortly stated as follows.
Askernish was incorporated in Western Australia on 2 June 1976. At material times it conducted an earthmoving equipment repair and maintenance business trading under the business name “Allplant and Mechanical Services”.
On 27 October 1989 Askernish executed a debenture agreement creating a fixed and floating charge over its assets in favour of Palliser Holding Pty Ltd (“Palliser”). By deed of assignment, said to be…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Askernish Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2004] FCA 400
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the plaintiff had a legitimate basis for requesting an extension of time and whether the extension would unduly prejudice any interested parties. The key issue was whether the extension would breach any statutory obligations or principles of natural justice.
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the extension, and that there would be no undue prejudice to the other interested parties if the extension was granted. The court considered the overall fairness of the process and the necessity of accommodating the plaintiff's request. Consequently, the court ordered that the time for reconvening the creditors' meeting be extended to 22 April 2004, with the caveat that any interested party could apply to vary the order with 48 hours' notice to the plaintiff. Additionally, the plaintiff's costs of the application were to be treated as costs in the administration of the company.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The time within which the plaintiff may reconvene the adjourned meeting of creditors of Askernish Pty Ltd (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed) (ACN 008 806 773) (“the company”) be extended to 22 April 2004.
2. Leave be reserved to any person claiming to be interested (including the Australian Securities Investment Commission, any creditor, or the receiver and manager) to vary these orders on 48 hours notice to the plaintiff.
3. The plaintiff’s costs of the application be costs in the administration of the company.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: LEE J
Full text does not contain this section.