Askernish Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Askernish Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 400

CORPORATIONS – voluntary administration – application for an order extending time to reconvene adjourned second meeting of creditors – whether the court has power to extend time – factors in exercise of discretion – liberty to apply granted.

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 421(2), 436E, 439A, 439B(2), 447A and 1322(4)

Cawthorn v Keira Constructions Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 337 cited
Mann v Abruzzi Sports Club Ltd (1994) 12 ACLC 137 cited
Milankov Nominees Pty Ltd v Roycol Ltd (1994) 52 FCR 378 cited

Re Double V Marketing Pty Ltd(in administration) (1995) 16 ACSR 498 cited

Re Locm Pty Ltd (1997) 79 FCR 35 cited

Re Old Papa’s Holdings Ltd; Ex parte Wallman (2001) 24 WAR 229 cited

Re Regency South Steyne Investments Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1546 cited

IN THE MATTER OF ASKERNISH PTY LTD (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed) (ACN 008 806 773)
W34 OF 2004

LEE J
13 FEBRUARY 2004
PERTH


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

W34 OF 2004

IN THE MATTER OF ASKERNISH PTY LTD (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed)
(ACN 008 806 773)

ANTHONY MICHAEL TRAVERS
PLAINTIFF

JUDGE:

LEE J

DATE OF ORDER:

13 FEBRUARY 2004

WHERE MADE:

PERTH

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The time within which the plaintiff may reconvene the adjourned meeting of creditors of Askernish Pty Ltd (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed) (ACN 008 806 773) (“the company”) be extended to 22 April 2004.

2.Leave be reserved to any person claiming to be interested (including the Australian Securities Investment Commission, any creditor, or the receiver and manager) to vary these orders on 48 hours notice to the plaintiff.

3.The plaintiff’s costs of the application be costs in the administration of the company.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

W34 OF 2004

IN THE MATTER OF ASKERNISH PTY LTD (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed)
(ACN 008 806 773)

ANTHONY MICHAEL TRAVERS
PLAINTIFF

JUDGE:

LEE J

DATE:

13 FEBRUARY 2004

PLACE:

PERTH

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

LEE J:

  1. By originating process filed on 12 February 2004 the plaintiff (“the administrator”) applied for an order pursuant to s 447A and/or s 1322(4)(d) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (“the Act”) extending the time within which the administrator may reconvene the adjourned second meeting of creditors of Askernish Pty Ltd (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed) (ACN 008 806 773) (“Askernish”).

  2. The relevant facts may be shortly stated as follows. 

  3. Askernish was incorporated in Western Australia on 2 June 1976.  At material times it conducted an earthmoving equipment repair and maintenance business trading under the business name “Allplant and Mechanical Services”. 

  4. On 27 October 1989 Askernish executed a debenture agreement creating a fixed and floating charge over its assets in favour of Palliser Holding Pty Ltd (“Palliser”).  By deed of assignment, said to be…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Askernish Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2004] FCA 400
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Askernish Pty Ltd was the subject of a dispute between the plaintiff and the administrator and receiver and manager, with the case being heard in a relevant Australian court. The plaintiff sought an extension of time to reconvene a creditors' meeting of the company, which had been adjourned previously. The case involved the interpretation of statutory provisions governing the convening of creditors' meetings and the associated procedural requirements.

The court was required to determine whether the plaintiff had a legitimate basis for requesting an extension of time and whether the extension would unduly prejudice any interested parties. The key issue was whether the extension would breach any statutory obligations or principles of natural justice.

The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the extension, and that there would be no undue prejudice to the other interested parties if the extension was granted. The court considered the overall fairness of the process and the necessity of accommodating the plaintiff's request. Consequently, the court ordered that the time for reconvening the creditors' meeting be extended to 22 April 2004, with the caveat that any interested party could apply to vary the order with 48 hours' notice to the plaintiff. Additionally, the plaintiff's costs of the application were to be treated as costs in the administration of the company.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The time within which the plaintiff may reconvene the adjourned meeting of creditors of Askernish Pty Ltd (administrator appointed) (receiver and manager appointed) (ACN 008 806 773) (“the company”) be extended to 22 April 2004.

2. Leave be reserved to any person claiming to be interested (including the Australian Securities Investment Commission, any creditor, or the receiver and manager) to vary these orders on 48 hours notice to the plaintiff.

3. The plaintiff’s costs of the application be costs in the administration of the company.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

LEE J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: LEE J

Full text does not contain this section.