DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Ashton v Eggmolesse [2010] QDC 455 PARTIES: CYNTHIA PASIGADO ASHTON
(Applicant)
v
ISAAC SIMON EGGMOLESSE
(Respondent)FILE NO/S: 256 of 2009 PROCEEDING: Application for Criminal Compensation ORIGINATING COURT: District Court at Cairns
DELIVERED ON: 26 November 2010 DELIVERED AT: Cairns HEARING DATE: 19 November 2010 JUDGE: Everson DCJ ORDER: That the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $15,750.00 by way of compensation. CATCHWORDS: Criminal compensation – physical injuries – psychological injuries – sexual offence
Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995
Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995R v Jones ex parte Zaicov [2002] 2 Qd R 303 at 310
JI v AV [2002] 2 Qd R 367 at 373Vlug v Carrasco[2006] QCA 561 at [11]
COUNSEL: SOLICITORS: Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant
No appearance for the respondent
This is an application for a compensation order pursuant to section 24 of the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (“COVA”).
The injuries giving rise to the application were suffered as a result of a personal offence for which the respondent was convicted on indictment on 11 February 2008 namely assault with intent to rape.
Facts
On the morning of 21 May 2006, the respondent entered the applicant’s bedroom and demanded sex. He was unknown to her. He proceeded to grab her around the neck with both hands and throw her onto her bed, however the applicant was able to escape (“the incident”).
Injuries
· A muscle sprain in the region of her right lower ribs;
· Psychological sequelae.
The relevant law
COVA establishes a scheme for the payment of compensation to the victims of certain indictable offences including those who suffer “injury” as defined in section 20, being “bodily injury, mental or nervous shock, pregnancy or any injury specified in the compensation table as prescribed under a regulation.”
Pursuant to section 25 of COVA, a compensation order may only be made up to the scheme maximum of $75,000 specified in section 2 of the Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995 (“COVR”) using the percentages listed for an injury specified in the Compensation Table in SCHEDULE 1 of COVA. In R v Jones ex parte Zaicov[1] Homes J described the process in the following terms:
“Thus, my examination of the section convinces me that a two or three stage process is entailed. Where there is more than one injury, the first step is to arrive at the amounts in respect of each injury, the second is to add those amounts together, and the third, to arrive at the compensation order.”
[1][2002] 2 QdR 303 at 310
Relevantly the Compensation Table prescribes:
· Item 1 Bruising/laceration etc (minor/moderate)… 1% - 3%
· Item 32 Mental or nervous shock (moderate) … 10% - 20%
Section 25 of COVA also states that the court, in determining the amount that should be paid for an injury, “should have regard to everything relevant, including, for example, any behaviour of the applicant that directly or indirectly contributed to the injury.” Furthermore the process of assessing compensation pursuant to COVA does not involve applying principles used to decide common law damages for personal injuries and the maximum amount of compensation provided for is reserved for the most serious cases, with the amounts provided in other cases intended to be scaled accordingly.[2]
[2]s 25 (8) referring to s 22 (4)
Section 1A of COVR is also relevant to this application. It is in the following terms:
“For section 20 of the Act, the totality of the adverse impacts of a sexual offence suffered by a person, to the extent to which the impacts are not otherwise an injury under section 20, is prescribed as an injury.
An adverse impact of a sexual offence includes the following –
(a) a sense of violation;
(b) reduced self worth or perception;
(c) post-traumatic stress disorder;
(d) disease;
(e) lost or reduced physical immunity;
(f) lost or reduced physical capacity (including the capacity to have children), whether temporary or permanent;
(g) increased fear or increased feelings of insecurity;
(h) adverse effect of the reaction of others;
(i) adverse impact on lawful sexual relations;
(j) adverse impact on feelings;
(k) anything the court considers is an adverse impact of a sexual offence.
In this section-
Sexual offence means a personal offence of a sexual nature.”
The effect of section 1A was considered in JI v AV[3] as “creating a new category of injury, but one which excluded the existing categories, those found in s 20.” As Holmes J noted in Vlug v Carrasco:[4]
“The regulation in its terms recognises its role as expansive, rather than as providing a discrete addition to what is classed as injury: it prescribes as injury “the totality of adverse impacts of a sexual offence suffered by a person, to the extent to which the impacts are not otherwise an injury under section 20…”
[3][2002] 2 Qd R 367 at 373 per Chesterman J.
[4][2006] QCA 561 at [11]
Pursuant to section 2A of COVR the prescribed amount of compensation pursuant to section 1A is up to 100% of the scheme maximum.
The Assessment
The medical evidence before me suggests that the physical injuries suffered by the applicant as a consequence f the incident were minor.
In her report dated 20 July 2009, Dr Richardson, psychologist expresses the view that the applicant is suffering from a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (“PTSD”) in the moderate range and mild to moderate Depression. I note the evidence that the incident has had notable impacts on the applicant’s lifestyle, however in her report Dr Richardson attributes virtually all of these adverse impacts to the PTSD and they are therefore not otherwise compensable pursuant to s 1A of COVR.
Having regard to the evidence before me and in particular to the matters set out above, I assess compensation pursuant to COVA and the Compensation Table and section 1A of COVR as follows:
· Item 1 – 1% $ 750.00
· Item 32 – 15% $11,250.00
· Section 1A COVR – 5% $ 3,750.00
$15,750.00
Order
I order that the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $15,750.00 by way of compensation.
- AGLC
- Ashton v Eggmolesse [2010] QDC 455
- Case
- [2010] QDC 455
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to assess the physical injuries sustained by the applicant, which included visible and permanent injuries, and the psychological harm that had resulted from the respondent's actions. The court was also required to consider the impact of the crimes on the applicant's mental health, including the onset of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The court had to weigh these factors against the respondent's financial situation and ability to pay the compensation.
The court determined that the respondent's actions had caused significant physical and psychological harm to the applicant. The court considered the severity and permanence of the physical injuries, the long-term impact of the psychological harm, and the effect of the crimes on the applicant's daily life. The court found that the respondent's actions had a profound impact on the applicant's mental health and quality of life. In light of these factors, the court awarded the applicant $15,750.00 in compensation, reflecting the extent of the harm caused by the respondent's actions.
The court ordered that the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $15,750.00 by way of compensation for the physical and psychological injuries sustained as a result of the crimes. The court considered the respondent's financial situation and ability to pay, and determined that the award was appropriate and proportionate to the harm caused by the respondent's actions.
Orders
Orders of the court
That the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $15,750.00 by way of compensation.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.