Asb17 v Minister for Home Affairs

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

ASB17

v

MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR

[2019] HCASL 194
M53/2019

  1. This application for special leave to appeal from a decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia requires an extension of time.  The proposed grounds of appeal have insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal.  Accordingly, it would be futile to grant the extension of time.  The application for special leave should be dismissed.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman
19 June 2019
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Asb17 v Minister for Home Affairs and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] HCASL 194
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

ASB17, an Australian resident, sought special leave to appeal a decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia. The matter involved the legality of the Minister for Home Affairs' decisions concerning the individual's visa status. The High Court was tasked with determining whether to grant an extension of time for the appeal, which was filed beyond the standard time limit. The primary issue for the court was whether the proposed grounds of appeal had sufficient merit to justify granting special leave, thereby permitting an extension of the time limit for the appeal.

The High Court examined the merits of the proposed grounds of appeal and assessed their likelihood of success. The court found that the arguments presented lacked the necessary strength to warrant an extension of time for the appeal. Given the limited prospects of success, the court concluded that granting special leave would be futile. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed, and the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia was upheld.

The High Court determined that the application for special leave should be dismissed due to the insufficient prospects of success associated with the proposed grounds of appeal. The court also found that the proposed grounds did not provide a compelling reason to extend the time limit for the appeal. As a result, the application for special leave was denied, and the decision of the Full Court remained in effect. The High Court directed the Registrar to prepare and seal an order dismissing the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.