[2014] FWCA 3221 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Asahi Beverages Services Australia Pty Ltd T/A Schweppes Australia
(AG2014/913)
ASAHI BEVERAGES SERVICES AUSTRALIA WELSHPOOL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 16 MAY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Aashi Beverages Services Australia Welshpool Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Aashi Beverages Services Australia Welshpool Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] United Voice, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] I had some concerns regarding the superannuation clause in the Agreement. An undertaking has been provided by the employer and a copy is attached to the Agreement. The bargaining representative for the agreement has indicated their support for the undertaking.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE408149 PR550615>
- AGLC
- Asahi Beverages Services Australia Pty Ltd T/A Schweppes Australia [2014] FWCA 3221
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 3221
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement met the requirements of section 230 of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees. The court needed to consider whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, taking into account the principles of the national workplace relations system. The court also had to determine whether the agreement was appropriately negotiated and whether it provided for a fair and transparent process for resolving disputes.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees. The agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, taking into account the principles of the national workplace relations system. The court found that the agreement was appropriately negotiated and provided for a fair and transparent process for resolving disputes. The agreement was approved by the Fair Work Commission, and the application was successful.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.