Arturi, Frank v Zupps Motors Pty Ltd Auswide Pty Ltd

Case

[1980] FCA 194

19 Oct 1980

No judgment structure available for this case.

CATCHWORDS

F e d e r a l

C o u r t

o f

A u s t r a l i a

-

J u r i s d i c t l o n

-

Consumer

p r o t e c t i o n

-

C o n d u c t c o n t r a v e n l n g

P a r t

I V o r P a r t

V

oi

T r a d e P r a c t l c e s

Act

___

1 9 7 4

-

I m p l i e d

c o n d l t i o n s

I n

c o n t r a c t

o f

s u p p l y

o f

goods

-

Supp ly

o f

m o t o r v e h l c l e

t o consumer

-

v e h i c l e n o t

o f

m e r c h a n t a b l e

q u a l i t y

-

Damages

s o u g h t

f r o m

s u p p l i e r

a n d

m a n u f a c t u r e r

-

T r a d e

P r a c t i c e s

Act

1 9 7 4

( C t h . )

s s .

4 ,

7 1 ,

74A,

7 4 D ,

8 2 ,

8 6 .

PraLLlce

-

Summary

d i s m l s s a l

-

Rules o f

C o u r t 0 . 1 0

r . 4 ;

0 . 2 0

r . 2 .

F rank Arturi v.

Zupps h lo tors P t y L t d .

and

ALIshide

P t y

L l m l t e d

__- -

QLD No.

G11 o f 1 9 8 0

Coram : Brcnnan J .

19 December 1980

C a n b e r r a .

IN THE FEDERAL COljRT

OF

AUSTRALIA

)

\

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

- '

1

QLD No.

G11 o f 1 9 8 0

GENERAL DIVISION

I N THE

IL4TTER

o f

t h e T r a d e P r a c t i c c s

Act

1 9 7 4

BETWEEN

:

FRANK ARTURI

--

Applicant

AN

-

D

:

ZUPPS MOTORS

PTY

LTD

_-

Pirst

Rcspondcnt

AND

-

:

AUSWIIIE

PTY

LIhll'I'ED

Second Respondent

O R D E R

JUDGE FIAKIKG ORDER

Brennan J .

DATE

OF ORDLR

1 9 December 1 9 8 0

WIIERE FIADE

-

C a n b e r r a .

TIII: COURT ORDERS THAT :

-

1.

T h e

a p p l i c a n t ' s

p r o c c e d l n g s

b e

dlsrnlssed

generally.

2 .

The

a p p l i c a n t

p a y

t h e

r e s p e c t l v c

r c s p o n d e n t s

t h c l r

C o s t s

o f

t h e p r o c e e d l n g s .

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )

>

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QLD No.

G 1 1 o f 1 9 8 0

1 -

GENERAL DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER o f

t h e T r a d e P r a c t i c c s

Act

1 9 7 4

BETWEEN : FRWX ARTURI

Appl i c a n t

A N D

__

: ZUPI'S MOTORS

PTY

LTD -

First

Respondent

AND

: AUSWIDE

PTY

LIMITED

-

Second

Rcspondent

Coram : Brennan J .

1 9 Dcccmber

1 9 8 0

REASONS FOR .JUDGMENT

T h e

a p p l i c a t i o n l n l t i a t i n g

these

p r o c e e d i n g s

c l a m s :

"1.

Damages

p u r s u a n t

t o

5 . 8 2

o€

t h e

T r a d e

P r a c t i c c s

Act

1 9 7 4

f o r b r e a c h o f

I m p l i e d c o n d i t l o n s

I n

a

c o n t r a c t

f o r

t h e s a l c o f

a

c e r t a l n n ~ o t ~ r v c h l c l c

r c f e r r e d t o

I n t h e S t a t e m e n t

o f

Clalm.

2 .

c o s t s .

, I

T h e a p p l l c a t i o n

was

accompdnied

by

a

S t a t e ~ n c n t o f C l a ~ n ~ , a n d I n

t h c

u l t l m a t c p a r a g r a p h

o f

t h a t

p l e a d ~ n g

t h c r e

I S a

c l d l m f o r

"c1n1:lngcs

f o r b r e a c h o f c o n t r a c t " .

A t a

d l r e c t l o n s h c a r l n g ,

a n

~ n t l m n t ~ o n

1,;~s g ~ v c n

t h a t

I t

would

be

desirable

t o d c t c r m l n e

as

a

p r e l i m i n a r y

q u r s t l o n

thc

~ u r i s d i c t i o n

o f

t h l s C o u r t

t o g l v e

t h e

r e l i e f

c l a i m e d ,

a n d

t h c

d l r c c t l o n s

h e a r i n g

was

a d l o u r n e d .

IUien

t h e a d ~ o u r n r d

d i r c c t l o n s

2 .

h c a r m g came

o n ,

c o u n s e l

f o r

t h e

r e s p e c t i v e

r c s p o n d e n t s

s u b m l t t e d

t h a t t h i s C o u r t d i d n o t h a v e ~ u r i s d i c t i o n t o g i v e t h e

r c l i c f

c l a i m e d ,

a n d

c o u n s e l

f o r

t h e

f i r s t

r e s p o n d e n t

moved

t o s t a y

o r

d l s m l s s

t h e p r o c e e d i n g s

as

f r i v o l o u s o r v e x a t l o u s o r a n a b u s c

o f

t h e

p r o c e s s

o

f

t h e

C o u r t .

T h e

r e q u l s l t e

n o t i c e

h a d

n o t

b e e n

g i v e n

u n d e r

0 . 1 0

r .4,

b u t

u p o n

t h e

f i r s t

r e s p o n d e n t

u n d e r t a k i n g

t o

f11c

a n a p p r o p r i a t e n o t i c e

o f

m o t i o n

n u n c

p r o

t u n c ,

I

d i s p e n s e d w i t h

s e r v i c e

o

f

t h e

n o t i c e .

A

t i m e t a b l e

was

s e t

f o r

t h e

r e c e i p t

o f

w r l t t c n

s u b m i s s i o n s

i n

s u p p o r t

o f

t h e o r a l

s u b m i s s i o n s a s

t o

j u r i s d i c t i o n w h i c h h a d b e e n

made

o n b e h a l f

o f

c a c h o f t h e p a r t i e s .

W r i t t e n

s u h m i s s l o n s

h a v e

now

b e e n

r e c e i v e d

f r o m

t h e

s o l l c l t o r s

f o r

t h o s e p a r t l e s

who

w i s h e d

t o a d d

t o w h a t

was

s a l d o n t h e l r b e h a l f .

The

r e l e v a n t

j u r l s d l c t i o n

of

t h l s C o u r t

i s

c o n f c r r c d h y

s . 8 6

o f

t h c

T r a d e

P r a c t i c e s

A

c

t

1 9 7 4

( t h e

A c t ) .

I t

p r o v l d e s :

I ,

J u r l s d l c t i o n

1 s

c o n f e r r c d o n

t h e C o u r t

t o h e a r

a n d

d e t e r m i n e

a c t i o n s ,

p r o s e c u t i o n s

a n d o t h c r

p r o c e e d l n g s

u n d e r

this

P a r t

a n d

t h a t

j u r l s d l c t i o n

i s

e x c l u s l v e

o f

t h e j u r ~ s d ~ c t l o n

o f

a n y o t h e r

c o u r t ,

o t h e r

t h a n

t h e

~ u r i s d i c t l o n o f t h e l l i g h C o u r t u n d c r s c c t l o n

7 5

o f

t h e

C o n s t l t u t l o n .

"

" F r o c c e d l n g s

u n d e r

t h l s

P a r t "

l n c l u d e

a

p r o c e c d l n g

under

S . 8 2 ( 1 ) :

I ,

A

p e r s o n who

s u f f c r s

l o s s

o r

damage

by

c o n d u c t

o f

a n o t h e r p e r s o n t h a t

was

d o n c

i n c o n t r a v e n t i o n

o f

a

p r o v l s l o n o f

P a r t

I V o r V

may

r c c o v c r

t h c a m o u n t

o f

t h c

l o s s o r

damage

by

a c t l o n

against

t h a t o t h e r p e r s o n

o r a g a ~ n s t a n y p e r s o n i n v o l v c d i n

t h e c o n t r a v c n t l o n . "

T h e q u e s t 1 0 1 1

t h u s

a r l s c s w h e t h e r

t h e

applicant

i n t h c s e

~ ~ - O C C > C L ? I J I ~ S

1s

s c e h l n g

t o

r c c o v e r

d

n

a m o u n t

oi'

l o s s o r

damage

causcd

by

" c o n d u c t

t h a t

was

d o n e I n c o n t r a v c n t l o n

of

a

p r o v l s ~ o n

o f . . . P d r t

L"'.

The

Statement

o f C l a i m a l l e g c s

t h a t

t h c

r r p p l l c a n t

e n t c r c d

i n t o a n a g r e c m c n t w l t h A u s t r n l l a n G u a r a n t e c C o r p o r a t l o n 1 . i n l t r d € o r

t h e

l c a s e

o f

a

F l a t m o t o r v c h ~ c l e w h i c h h a d h c c n

i n p o r t c d

i n t o

3 . .

A u s t r a l i a b y

t h e

s e c o n d

r e s p o n d e n t ,

a

" c o r p o r a t l o n "

a s d e f i n e d b y

s . 4

o f

t h e

Act;

t h a t

t h e a p p l l c a n t n e g o t l a t c d

hvlth

t h e

f l r s t

r e s p o n d e n t

( a l s o

a

"corporation")

f o r t h e

a c q u i s l t i o n

o f

new

F l a t

m o t o r v e h i c l e ,

a n d

t h a t

t h e

a p p l i c a n t

a n d

f l r s t

r e s p o n d e n t

a g r c e d

t h a t

t h e a p p l i c a n t " s h o u l d a c q u i r e

t h e s a i d v e h i c l e b y

way

o f

l e a s e "

f r o m A u s t r a l i a n G u a r a n t e e C o r p o r a t i o n L l m l t e d ;

a n d

t h a t

t h e

first

r e s p o n d e n t

d e l i v e r e d

t h e

m o t o r

v e h l c l e

t o

t h e

a p p l i c a n t .

A l t h o u g h

t h e S t a t e m e n t

o f

Claim

d o e s n o t

i n

terms

a l l e g e

a

c o n t r a c t b e t w c e n

t h e a p p l l c a n t a n d

t h e

f i r s t

r e sponden t

(wh lch

I

s h a l l c a l l

" t h e

d e a l e r " ,

t h o u g h

t h e

S t a t e m e n t

o f

Claim

d o e s

n o t

s o

d e s c r l b e

i t ) ,

I

a s s u m e

t h a t

t h e p l e a d e r ' s

i n t e n t l o n w a s

t o a l l e g e

t h a t

t h e a p p l l c a n t

a n d

t h e d e a l e r w e r e p a r t i e s

t o

a

c o n t r a c t

f o r

t h e s u p p l y

of

t h e F l a t

m o t o r

v e h i c l e .

T h a t

a s s u m p t i o n

i s

b a s e d

u p o n

a l l c g a t l o n s

t h a t

t h e r e

was

an

"agreement"

between

them

l ihlch

was

" s u b ~ e c t

t o a n ~ m p l l e d

c o n d l t l o n

t h a t

t h e

s a i d m o t o r v e h l c l e

was

r e a s o n a b l y f l t

f o r

t h c

pu rpose" ,

i . e . ,

f o r

u s e

as a

p r i v a t e

m o t o r

v e h l c l e ,

"hy

r e a s o n

o i

t h c p r o v i s i o n s o f

s.71

o f

t h e T r a d e F r a c t l c e s A c t

1 9 7 4 " ,

and

whlch

h a s " s u b ~ e c t

t o

a

f u r t h e r

l n l p l i e d

c o n d i t l o n

t h a t

t h e

s a i d

motor

b c h l c l e

]\as o f

m e r c h a n t a b l e q u a l l t y

by

v l r t u e

o f

t h c p r o v i s ~ o n s " o f

t h e

same

s e c t i o n ,

I n

i t s

r e l e v a n t p a r t s ,

s .71

p r o v l d e s :

I t

(1) Where a

c o r p o r a t i o n

s u p p l i e s .

.

. g o o d s

t o n

c o n s u m e r

i n

t h e

c o u r s e

of

a

b u s l n e s s ,

t h e r e

i s

a n

I m p l i e d c o n d ~ t i o n

t h a t

t h e

goods

supplied

u n d e r

t h e

c o n t r a c t

f o r

t h e s u p p l y

o f

t h e g o o d s

a r e

o f

m c r c h a n t a h l c

I t

q u a l l t y , ...

I'

( 2 )

It'herc

a

c o r p o r a t l o n

s u p p l l c s . .

. g o u d s

t o a

c011sumcr

i n

t h e

c o u r s e o f

a

b u s i n e s s

a n d

t h e

C O ~ S L I I I P ~ ,

c s p r c \ \ l y

o r

b

y

i r n p l l c a t l o n ,

m a k e s

known

t o

t h c c o r p u r ~ t l o n o r

to

t h c p e r s o n b y

whom

a n y a n t e c c d c n t n c g o t l a t i o n s a r c

c o n d u c t e d a n y p n r t ~ c u l a r p u r p o s e

f o r

\ \ h l c h

t he

g o o d s

']re

b e l n g acquired,

t h c r e

I S an

l rnp l lcd

condition

t h a t

thr

g o o d s

s u p p l i e d

u n t f c r

t h e

c o n t r a c t

T o r

t h c

s u p p l y

01

t h e

g o o d s

a r e

r e a s o n a b l y

i l t

f o r t h a t

p u r p o q e , . , .

1 1

S e c t i o n

7 1

a p p e a r s

t o

h a v e

b c c n

d r a a n

Crom

t h r

S u p p l y

o r Goo(15

. -.

__

( Jmpl ied

Tcrms)

Act

1 9 7 3

( U . K . ) ,

s . 3 ,

As

c o n d i t i o n 5

d r e

11npllcCl

b y

4 .

s.71

o n l y

w h e n

g o o d s

a r e

s u p p l i e d

u n d e r

a

c o n t r a c t

by

t h e o b l l g o r

c o r p o r a t l o n ,

I

a s s u m e

t h a t

t h e p l e a d e r

i n t e n d e d

t o

a l l c g e

a

c o n t r a c t

b e t w e e n

t h e a p p l i c a n t a n d

t h e d c a l e r a n d

t o c l a i m d a m a g e s

f o r

b r e a c h

o

f

c o n d i t i o n s

s t a t u t o r l l y

i m p l i e d

I n

i t .

T h e

S t a t e m c n t

o f

C l a i m a l l e g e s b r e a c h e s

o f

t h e

i m p l l e d c o n d l t l o n s

i n

t h a t

t h e motor

v e h i c l e

was

n o t

f l t

f o r u s e a s

a

p r i v a t e m o t o r v c h l c l c a n d

was

n o t

o f m e r c h a n t a b l e q u a l i t y .

J u r i s d i c t i o n a r i s e s u n d e r

s .82

when

the

damage

claimed

i n t h e p r o c e e d i n g s

i s

a l l c g e d

t o h a v e b e e n c a u s e d b y c o n d u c t d o n e

i n

c o n t r a v e n t i o n o f P a r t

IV

o r V

o f

t h e Act,

t h a t

i s t o

s a y , c o n d u c t

w h i c h d o e s n o t c o n f o r m t o n o r m s o f c o n d u c t p r e s c r l b e d b y

t h o s e

p r o v i s l o n s .

S e c t l o n

7 1

p r e s c r i b e s

n o

n o r m

o i c o n d u c t :

i t

a f f e c t s

t h e

l e g a l

r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n p a r t l e s

t o

a

c o n t r a c t b y

i m p o r t l n g

o n e

o r

more

c o n d l t l o n s

l n t o

t h e

c o n t r a c t .

I t d o e s

n o t

p r o s c r l b c

c o n d u c t

b

y

t h e

s u p p l l e r

o f

goods ;

i t

r c l a t c s

t o

t h c q r l a l l t y

o f

t h e

g o o d s

s u p p l i e d .

T h e m a r e

t w o

r c a s o n s

hhy

a

b r c a c h

o f

a

c o n d i t l o n

lshich

i s i m p l l e d

b y

5 . 7 1

d o e s n o t

I n v o l v e

c o n d u c t

i n

c o n t r a v e n t l o n

o f

a

p r o v l s i o n

of

P a r t V.

F i r s t ,

t h e

b r e a c h

d o e s

n o t

c o n s i s t

i n

t h e

c o n d u c t

o

f

s u p p l y i n g

g o o d s ,

b u t

I n

t h c

w a n t

o f

c o r r c s p o n d c n c e

b e t w e e n

t h e

s t a t e

o i t h e g o o d s

s u p p l l e d

a n d

t h e

quality

r e f c r r e d t o

I n

S . 7 1 .

S e c o n d l y ,

s.71

t a k e s

e i f e c t

by

I m p o s l n g

a n

o b l i g a t l o n

u p o n o n e o f

t h e c o n t r a c t l n g p a r t i c s a s

t h o u g h

t h e p a r t l e s h a d

e m b o d i e d

t h e

o b l i g a t l o n

I n

t h e l r

c o n t r a c t .

No

d o u b t

I t

1 s r i g h t

t o

s a y t h a t

t h e o b l i g a t i o n

i s

s t n t u t o r i l y c r e a t e d ,

f o r

t h e c o n c l l t l o n

c a n d e r i v e n o

f o r c e

f r o m a n a c t u a l o r

i m p l l e d

consent

o i t h e p a r t i c s

whose

frccdom

t o

e x c l u d e

I t s

i m p o s i t l o n

1 s rernovcd

by

s . 6 S .

But

by

d e s c r l b l n g

t h e o b l l g a t i o n

as

a n

j c l p l l e d

c o n d i t l o n ,

5 . 7 1

d c i l n e s

t h e

n a t u r e

o f

t h e o b l l g a t l o n .

I t I S a n

o b l l g a t i o n

v , h l c h

t a h e s

c r f c c l

by a

l e g a l

f i c t ~ o n , n a m e l y ,

t ha t

thc p n r t ~ e s

had In,lde

a

c o n t r d c t

w h l c h

i n c l u d e d

t h c

o b l l g n t i o n .

F o r

t h c

p u r p o s r s

o r s . 8 2 ,

t h e r e I o r c ,

a

b r c a c h

of

t h e o b l i g a t l o n

15

n o t

to b c

t r e , i t e d

a s

a

b r e a c h

01 an

o h l i g n t l o n

I m p o s e d

u p o n

t h e

o b l l g o r

by

t h e Act

d r h o r s

the

c o n t r a c t ,

h u t

a s

a n o b l l g a t l o n

i m p o s e d b y

t h e c o n t r a c t

l t \ e l f .

5.

I t i o l l o w s t h a t

a

p r o c e e d i n g

f o r d a m a g e s

f o r b r e a c h

o f

a

5.71

c o n d i t i o n 1s n o t a

p r o c e e d i n g

f a l l i n g w ~ t h i n

s . 8 2 .

I t

w o u l d b e s t a r t l i n g

I f

a

b r e a c h o f

a

5 . 7 1

c o n d i t i o n were

a

c o n t r a v e n t i o n

of

t h e s e c t i o n ,

f o r

on

t h a t h y p o t h e s i s

I t would,

by

v i r t u e

o f

5 . 7 9 ,

b e

p u n i s h a b l e

o n

c o n v i c t i o n .

So

a b s u r d

a

c o n s e q u e n c e

c o u l d

n o t

h a v e

b e e n

i n t e n d e d .

A

clalm

1 s a l s o made

a g a l n s t

t h e

s e c o n d

r e s p o n d e n t

( t h e

i m p o r t e r ) , w h i c h

i s

a l l e g e d t o b e

a

" n ~ a n u f a c t u r e r " o f

t h e

v e h l c l e

w l t h i n

t h e

m e a n i n g

o f

t h a t

t e r m

i n

s . 7 4 A .

T h e

a p p l i c a n t

1s

a l l e g e d t o h a v e b e e n

a

"consumer"

w l th ln

t he

mean lng

o f

t h a t

term i n t h e

Act,

a n d

p a r a g r a p h

14

o f

t h e S t a t c r n e n t

o f

Cla lm

1s

p l e a d e d

i n

t h e s e

terms:

1 1

I n

t h e

p r e m l s e s

t h e

s u p p l y

o f

g o o d s

b y

t h e

s e c o n d

r e s p o n d e n t

was

s u b ~ c c t t o an

u n p l i c d

c o n d i t i o n

t h a t

t h e s a l d m o t o r v c h l c l e w a s

o f

m e r c h a n t a b l e q u a l i t y

by

r c a s o n

o f

t h e p r o v i q j o r i s

o f

S e c t l o n

74D

o f

t h c T r n d c P r a c t l c e s

Act

1!)74.

( 1

T h e a l l e g a t i o n a n d t h e r e l l e f

which

1 s

c l a i m e d

t h c r c o n

a r e

m l s c o n c e i v c d .

S e c t i o n

74D

d o e s

n o t

l m p l y

a

c o n d J t i o n ,

a n d

J t

h a s

n

o

o p e r a t i o n

u n l e s s

t h e

m a n u f a c t u r e r

s u p p l i e s

thc

goods

t o

dnoth;;

p e r s o n

who

a c q u i r e s

t h e g o o d s

f o r

r e - s u p p l y

(s.741)(1)

( J ) ) .

I t

d o e s n o t r e l a t e t o

a

c o n t r a c t b c t w e e n

a

m a n u f a c t u r e r

a n d

a

c o n s u m e r ,

a n d

t h e

a p p l l c a n t

c a n

f o u n d

110

c l a i m

f o r

d a m a g c s

I o r

b r e a c h

o f

c o n t r a c t

u p o n

s . 7 3 D .

T

h

e

c l a l m

s o

f r n m c d

d l s c l o s c h

n o

r e a s o n a b l e

g r o u n d

o f

a c t l o n a n d ,

as

L m d l e y

L . J .

s a l d

111

D n ~ l s v e l l

v.

Jacobs

(1887)

L.R.34

Ch.D.278

a t

p . 2 8 4 ,

w l t h

r e s p e c t

t o

~ u c h

a

p l e a d i n g

"It

i s

d e m u r r a b l e

a t once, and I t I S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t h i n g

more,

i t I S

p e r f e c t l y

f r l v o l o u s . "

I t c a n n o t

b e

a l l o a e d

t o

s t a n d .

I t may

b e

t h a t

t h e p l e a d e r

l n t c n d l e d

t o L - ] a i m

c o m p e n s a t l o n

u n d e r

s . 7 4 D

a g a l n s t

thc

s e c o n d

r c % p o n J c n t

011

t h e

f o o t i n g

t h a t

t h e a p p l i c a n t

s u r f c r e d

d a m a g e

b

y

r c a s o n

t h : ~ t

t h e

I l a t

m o t o r

v e h l c l e ,

h a v i n g

b c c n

s u p p l l e d

b

y

t h e

~ m p o r L c r

t o

t h c

d e a l e r

a n d

h a v l n g

b e e n

s u p p l l e d

b

y

t h e

d c a l c r

t o

t h e

applicant

s o as

t o

6 .

fulfil

t h e

r e q u l r e m e n t s

o f

s . 7 4 D ( 1 ) ( a )

and

( b ) ,

has

n o t

o

f

m e r c h a n t a b l e

q u a l l t y .

I f

t h e

c l a l i n

h a d

b e e n

s o

f r amed ,

t he

damages

w o u l d

n o t

h a v e

b e e n

r e c o v e r a b l e

" p u r s u a n t

t o

S . 8 2 " .

A

p r o c e e d l n g

f o r compensation

b y

r c a s o n

of

goods

n o t b e l n g o f m c r c h a n t a h l c

q u a l l t y

i s n o t

a

c l a im

€o

r

damage

by

conduc

t

cun t r avcn lng

p r o v l s l o n

o f

P a r t V.

A

d e f e c t

i n

t h e

q u a l i t y

o f

goods

i s n o t

"conduct"

and

i t

1 s t h e r e f o r e n o t

c o n t r a v e n l n g

c o n d u c t

f a l l i n g

w i t h i n

s . 8 2 .

l h e

a p p l i c a n t

has

n o t

i n v o k e d

t h e

~ u r l s d ~ c t l o n

o f

t h l s C o u r t

I n a n y m a t t e r

I n

r e s p c c t o f w h i c h

j u r l s d l c t l o n

i s

c o n f e r r e d

u p o n

i t by

Par t

VI,

n o r

d o

h l s p l e a d i n g s

r e l y

on

any

o t h c r p r o v l s l o n o f t h e

Act

t o c o n f e r ~ u r i s d ~ c t i o n .

l h e

a p p l l c a t i o n

m u s t

t h c r e f o r e

b c

d l s m l s s e d .

An

argument based upon

S . 32

o f

t h e F e d e r a l C o u r t

o f

A u s t r a l i a

Act

1 9 7 6

( C t h . )

t h a t

t h c C o u r t m l g h t

e x e r c i s e

J u r l s d l c t l o n

i n

an

a s 5 o c l n t e d

m a t t c r

d o e s

n o t

d r l s e

€ o r

d e t e r m l n a t i o n .

l l l a t

s c c t l o n

has

e f f e c t

only when t h e

j u r i s d l c t l o n o f

t h e C o u r t

1 s

~n\-okeed I n

a

m a t t e r

I n

b . h l c h

j u r l s d l c t l o n

h a s

b e e n

v e s t e d

I n I t .

.4s

I

c o n q t r u c

t h e

a p p l i c a t l o n

dnd

t h e

s t a t e m e n t

of

c l a l m ,

t h e

applicant h a s

n o t

~ n v o h e d j u r l s d l c t l o n I n

s u c h

a

m a t t e r .

I t

i s

n o t n e c e s s a r y

I n o r d e r

t o d l s p o s e

o f

t h e s e

p r o c e e d l n g s

t o r c f c r

t o

t h e

j u r i s d l c t i o n

t o e n f o r c v c l a i m s ~ \ h l s h

a r c

p r o p e r l y

made

u n d e r

s.74D.

S e c t l o n

74(1)

r e f e r s

t o

t h L i t

j u r l s d i c t l o n .

T h e

s u b - s e c t l o n

c r e a t e s

a

l l a b l l l t y

i n

t h e

m a n u f a c t u r e r c o r p o r a t i o n

t o c o m p e n s a t c

t h e c ~ n ~ u m e r a n d p r o t 1 c l c s

t h a t

t h e

c o n s u m e r

"may

r c c o v e r

t h e

a l n o ~ l n t

o f

t he

compensation

by

d c t l o n a g a ~ n s t t h e c o r p o r a t l o n

111 a

c o u r t o f

c o m p e t e n t

j u r l s d i c t l o n . '

As

t h a t p r o v l s j o n ~ t s e l f does

n o t

c r e a t e 3 n v b t d n d d r d

o r

c u r i a l

c o m p e t e n c y ,

t h c

s t a n d a r d

m

u

s

b c

t

round

c l s c v h e r e

1x1

r ede ra1

lL1!*,

and

I t may

b e I o u n d i n s . 3 9 ( ? )

o f

t h c ~

-

J u d l c 1 a r v

2

Act

1 9 0 3

( C t h . )

(sce

Commonwralth

v .

l l n l t o n

( 1 9 2 3 )

3.5

C.L.R.352

a t p . 4 5 5 ) ,

01' In

..

o t h e r p r o v l s l o n s

a p t

t o c o n f e r ~ u r l s d ~ c t ~ o n

u p o n

t h e

c o u r t . ;

oC

t h c

S t a t e s

o r T e r r l t o r l c s .

I

do

n o t

p c r c c l v c

a

~ u r l s d i c t i o n

111 t h ~ s

C o u r t

t o g r a n t

r e l l c f

I n

a

c l a l m d r l s l n g

s o l e l y u n d e r

s . 7 4 n .

. I

.

..

7

1

I t w a s

s u b m i t t e d

t h a t

1

s h o u l d d e p a r t

from

t h e u s u a l

o r d e r a s

t o c o s t s b e c a u s e

i t

h a d b e e n - h e l d b y B o u l t e r

D . C . J .

i n

F l e t c h c r

v .

S e d d o n

A t k i n s o n

( A u s t r a l i a )

P t y . L t d .

(1979)

1 N.S.W.L.R.

1 6 9

t h a t

j u r i s d i c t i o n t o a k a r d d a m a g e s f o r b r e a c h o f

a

c o n d i t i o n

i m p l i e d b y

s.71

was

t o b e v e s t e d e x c l u s l v e l y

i n

t h e F e d e r a l C o u r t ,

a n d

t h a t h l s H o n o u r ’ s

view

was

t h e o n l y

J u d i c i a l p r o n o u n c e m e n t u n t i l

Roger s

J .

i n

Z a l a i

v .

C o l

C r a w f o r d

( R e t a i l )

P t y . L t d .

( 1 9 6 0 )

ATPR

4 2 , 4 4 8

d e c i d e d

t h a t

s . 6 6

c o n f e r s n o

j u r l s d l c t i o n o n

t h i s C o u r t

t o

e n t e r t a i n p r o c e e d i n g s

o f

t h a t k i n d ,

a

d e c i s i o n w i t h w h i c h

I

r e s p e c t f u l l y

a g r e e

f o r

t h e

r e a s o n s

a b o v e

s t a t e d .

The

f a c t

t h a t

R o u l t e r

D . C . J .

h a d

e x p r e s s e d

a

c o n t r a r y

v i e w

i s no g r o u n d

f o r

r e f u s l n g

a

5 u c c e s s f u l

p a r t y

a

n

l n d e m n l t y

f o r

i t s

c o s t s .

I

w o u l d d i s m i s s

t h e p r o c e r d l n g s

hTith

c o s t s .

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0