[2013] FWCA 135 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Arthritis Foundation of South Australia Inc
(AG2012/14373)
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Clerical industry | |
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 8 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Arthritis Foundation of South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Arthritis Foundation of South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Arthritis Foundation of South Australia Inc. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 15 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 November 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899219 PR532969>
- AGLC
- Arthritis Foundation of South Australia Inc [2013] FWCA 135
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 135
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission examined the terms and conditions of the proposed agreement, ensuring they met the minimum standards set out by the Act. The Commission also assessed whether the agreement was consistent with the National Employment Standards, which include provisions such as maximum weekly hours of work, request for flexible working arrangements, and the right to request unpaid parental leave. The Commission found that the agreement complied with these requirements and was in accordance with the National Employment Standards.
The Commission concluded that the Arthritis Foundation of South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2012 met all necessary legal criteria. Therefore, it approved the agreement, allowing it to be implemented. The decision was made to ensure that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for employees while also protecting the interests of the employer.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.