Arnold, Re M.J. Bankrupt, Ex Parte The Arnold, Re J.P.

[1988] FCA 590

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )

DIVISION	GENERAL	1
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE SOUTHERN ) DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND )

QLD E200 Of 1986

RE: MARGARET JOYCE ARNOLD

EX PARTE: THE BANKRUPT

QLD E201 of 1986

RE:  JOHN PETER ARNOLD

EX PARTE: THE BANKRUPT

MINUTES OF ORDER

JUDGE MAKING ORDER:	PINCUS J.
DATE OF ORDER:	19 SEPTEMBER 1988

BRISBANE	WHERE MADE:
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

Rule 124 of the Bankruptcy Rules.

1. the bankrupt Margaret Joyce Arnold be and she

hereby is discharged from her bankruptcy;

2.	the bankrupt John Peter Arnold be and he hereby	is
discharged from h l s bankruptcy.

- NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in

..

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )

I

GENERAL DIVISION	)
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT	OF THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND	)

I .

QLD E200 Of 1986 I .

RE:	MARGARET JOYCE ARNOLD	, .
I
EX	PARTE:	THE BANKRUPT

l

QLD E201 Of 1986 F .

I ,

RE:  JOHN PETER ARNOLD

EX PARTE: THE BANKRUPT

PINCUS J. 19 SEPTEMBER 1988

EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

These are two applications for discharge, the applicants l ..

being husband and wife, who became bankrupt in each case on their	.
own petitions some two and a half years ago, that is, on	13 14arch

1986.   The material before me discloses that the debts due consist

in some $15,000 owing to unsecured creditors and total of about

$27,000, being the balance of moneys due to secured creditors, the

Ipswich and West I4oreton Building Society, Direct Acceptance

Corporation	Pty	Llmited	and	Australian	Guarantee	Corporation	'
Limited.

The debt originally due to the building society has

!

i

I , ; L-

>-

L .

The explanation of the bankruptcy is that according to the

I trustee's report, I t r Arnold's employer (if that is the right word)

Stowemarket Pty Ltd became insolvent because a company called

Permanent Pantry Pty Limited, to which Stowemarket had contracted

Mr Arnold's services, failed.

The material discloses that both Mr and Mrs Arnold have

the opportunity of obtaining some remunerative employment if a

discharge is granted. At present they have none, although there

has been some employment since the date of bankruptcy, for a

period of three months. In my opinion, the facts disclose a good

ground for ordering a discharge in each case and it will be so

_.

ordered. , .;

certify that this and the o n e pr ceding

pages ar2 a true copy of the reasons for

judgpent hcreln of His Honour

Associate