Reported Decision: 119 LGERA 384
APPEAL PARTLY DISMISSED
Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Armstrong and Anor v Ashfield Municipal Council [2001] NSWLEC 277 PARTIES: APPLICANTS:
Leonard Armstrong
Christina ArmstrongRESPONDENT:
Ashfield Municipal CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 40184 of 2001 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Existing Use Rights :- inference to be drawn from historical records - effect of consent to continuation of use under cl 34 of the County of Cumberland Planning Scheme Ordinance - categorisation of use. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 106, s 106(b)(i), s 109B
Local Government Act 1919 s 341, s 342 AS
Ashfield Local Environment Plan 1985
County of Cumberland Planning Scheme Ordinance cl 24, cl 34, cl 34(1), cl 34(2)
Ordinance No. 105 Town and Country Planning - General Interim DevelopmentCASES CITED: North Sydney Municipal Council v Boyts Radio and Electrical Pty Ltd and Others (1989) 67 LGRA 344;
Royal Agricultural Society of New South Wales v Sydney City Council (1987) 61 LGRA 305;
Shire of Perth v O'Keefe and Another (1964) 110 CLR 529;
South Sydney City Council v M. & D. Cooper (Bignold J, NSWLEC, 28 May 1997, unreported);
Woollahra Municipal Council v Banool Developments Pty Limited (1973) 129 CLR 138;
Woollahra Municipal Council v Hinton (1967) 13 LGRA 417DATES OF HEARING: 29/10/2001, 20/11/2001 (final written submissions) DATE OF JUDGMENT:
12/07/2001LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
APPLICANTS:
Mr DP Wilson (Barrister)
SOLICITORS:
Wilshire WebbRESPONDENT:
Mr MG Craig QC
SOLICITORS:
Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 40184 of 2001
ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J
OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 7 December 2001
Christina Armstrong
Respondent
2. The first applicant, Leonard Armstrong, has commenced class 1 proceedings by way of an appeal against a refusal of a development application made to Ashfield Municipal Council (“the council”) for alterations and additions to the existing residential flat building. On 13 July 2001 the council was granted leave to amend its statement of issues in the class 1 proceedings to include the following issues:-
1. The applicants are the proprietors of land known as lot 1 DP 908000, 6 Kensington Road, Summer Hill (“the premises”). Erected on the land is a building currently divided into four flats. Under the Ashfield Local Environment Plan 1985 (“the LEP”), gazetted on 20 December 1985, the land is in Zone No. 2 (a) (Residential Zone). The use of the land for the purposes of a residential flat building has been at all times prohibited in the Residential 2(a) zone.
- 18. (a) Whether the use of the existing building is an “existing use” within the meaning of s.106 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 .
- (b) If the answer to (a) is in the negative, whether the proposed development is prohibited.
4. The class 4 application seeks a declaration in the following form:-
3. These class 4 proceedings were commenced on 5 October 2001.
- A declaration…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Armstrong v Ashfield Municipal Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2001] NSWLEC 277
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.