Arman & Arman
Case
•
[2009] FamCA 8
•19 January 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Arman & Arman [2009] FamCA 8
[2009] FamCA 8
19 January 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Arman & Arman*, heard before Cronin J, the dispute concerned the costs awarded in property and parenting proceedings between the husband and wife.
The court was required to determine the quantum and method of payment of the wife's costs, specifically in relation to the property and parenting proceedings that concluded after a case assessment conference.
Cronin J ordered that the husband pay one half of the wife's costs, to be assessed in accordance with the Family Law Rules 2004. These costs were to be paid from the husband's entitlement arising from the sale of the B Street property. Pending the final assessment and agreement on the sum of costs, the husband's entitlement from the property sale was to be held in an interest-bearing account by the legal practitioners managing the sale, with no payment to be made to the husband in the interim.
The court was required to determine the quantum and method of payment of the wife's costs, specifically in relation to the property and parenting proceedings that concluded after a case assessment conference.
Cronin J ordered that the husband pay one half of the wife's costs, to be assessed in accordance with the Family Law Rules 2004. These costs were to be paid from the husband's entitlement arising from the sale of the B Street property. Pending the final assessment and agreement on the sum of costs, the husband's entitlement from the property sale was to be held in an interest-bearing account by the legal practitioners managing the sale, with no payment to be made to the husband in the interim.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Injunction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Arman & Arman [2009] FamCA 8
Most Recent Citation
KARALIS & BELLA (No.2) [2010] FMCAfam 1476
Cases Citing This Decision
7
Ainscrow & Gilborne
[2021] FCCA 1182
Shorland and Rich
[2018] FCCA 1928
Ripley and Gregg
[2014] FCCA 2739
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
1
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty ltd
[1993] FCA 801
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty ltd
[1993] FCA 801