Neurizon Pty Ltd v LTH Consulting and Marketing Services Pty Ltd
[2002] FCA 1547
Citation 1
(Para 8)
…ld of economic endeavour, namely the conduct of gaming facilities. See the Neurizon Pty Ltd v LTH Consulting and Marketing Services Pty Ltd decision, 58 IPR 93, at paragraphs 100 and 101, and the CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Ltd decision, (1994) 28 IPR 481.…
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v F H Faulding & Co Ltd
[2000] FCA 316
Citation 2
(Para 11)
…Mr Berman referred to the Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v F H Faulding & Co Ltd decision, (2000) 46 IPR 553. The following statement is at page 564. "If a patent application, lodged in Australia, refers to information derived from a number of prior publications referred to in the specification or, generally, to matters wh…
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd
[1980] HCA 9
Citation 3
(Para 17)
…cifications do not normally form part of the common general knowledge, the Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd decision, (1980) 144 CLR 253 at page 294, states that: "There may be some fields of endeavour in which those who work therein study and make themselves familiar with all patent s…
Meyers Taylor Pty Ltd v Vicarr Industries Ltd
[1977] HCA 19
Citation 4
(Para 24)
…The Meyers Taylor Pty Ltd v Vicarr Industries Ltd decision, (1977) 137 CLR 228, provides an appropriate test for novelty. The test is also known as the "reverse infringement test". Aickin J., at page 235, states: "The basic test for anticipation or want of novelty is the same as that for infringement and generally on…
Novo Nordisk A/S v Eli Lilly And Company
[2000] APO 67
Citation 5
(Para 13)
…In Novo Nordisk A/S v Eli Lilly And Company, [2000] APO 67, the delegate of the commissioner discussed the Bristol-Meyers Squibb decision in the following terms: "The assessment is based on the common general knowledge as it is presented on the face of the specification. If information is stated to be common gen…