Legal Research
Cases
Argyle Lending Pty Ltd v Lantouris

Argyle Lending Pty Ltd v Lantouris

Case [2021] VCC 259

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Argyle Lending Pty Ltd v Lantouris [2021] VCC 259
Case: [2021] VCC 259
Decision Date: 25 March 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Argyle Lending Pty Ltd v Lantouris [2021] VCC 259

Most Recent Citation

Argyle Lending Pty Ltd v Lantouris [2022] VSCA 60

Cases Citing This Decision

Argyle Lending Pty Ltd v Lantouris [2022] VSCA 60
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…a single proceeding, seeking to recover money from the respondent, Maria Lantouris (‘Lantouris’).[1] [1] Argyle Lending Pty Ltd & Ors v Lantouris [2021] VCC 259 (‘Reasons’).…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Realm Resources Ltd v Aurora Place Investments Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 379
Citation 1

…d (2015) 256 CLR 104; Newcomb v Newcomb (1934) NSW STRAP 44; (1934) 34 SR NSW 446; Realm Resources Limited v Aurora Place Investments Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 379; Toyota Finance Australia Limited v Gardiner (2016) NSWCA 162…
Talacko v Bennett [2017] HCA 15
Citation 2 (Para 37)

…r another ( Talacko v Bennett [2017] HCA 15 at [37], albeit that Talacko was concerned more with the interaction between s 58(3) of the Act and s 15(2) of the Foreign Judgments Act 1991 (Cth)). We make this observation to emphasise the point that a liberal reading of s 58(5), which itself operates as a carve out…
Lawrence & Hanson Group Pty Ltd, in the matter of Pugliese v Pugliese [2016] FCA 1278
Citation 3 (Para 24)

…gliese v Pugliese [2016] FCA 1278 at [24] and [25] per Gleeson J. But the relief sought by Morris Finance in the present case is distinguishable. Orders for sale and ancillary orders are sought.”…
Toyota Finance Australia Limited v Gardiner [2016] NSWCA 162
Citation 4

…04; Newcomb v Newcomb (1934) NSW STRAP 44; (1934) 34 SR NSW 446; Realm Resources Limited v Aurora Place Investments Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 379; Toyota Finance Australia Limited v Gardiner (2016) NSWCA 162…
Hillam v Iacullo [2016] NSWCA 1
Citation 5

…Credit Corp Ltd v Gray [1992] 1 VR 540; G Scammell and Nephew Ltd v Ouston [1941] AC 251; Gibbons v Pozzan (2007) 209 FLR 233; Hillam v Iacullo (2015) 90 NSWLR 422; ICTA Investments Pty Ltd T/A Jolly Roger & Anor v GE Commercial Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd & Anor [2006] NSWCA 290; In re Perkins; Poyser v Beyfus [1…
Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 37
Citation 6

…SC Australia Pty Ltd and Ors [2013] VSC 701; Morris Finance v Brown (2017) FCAFC 97; Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; Newcomb v Newcomb (1934) NSW STRAP 44; (1934) 34 SR NSW 446; Realm Resources Limited v Aurora Place Investments Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 379; Toyota Finance Aus…
Hillam v Iacullo [2015] NSWCA 196
Citation 7

…Canada); Custom Credit Corp Ltd v Gray [1992] 1 VR 540; G Scammell and Nephew Ltd v Ouston [1941] AC 251; Gibbons v Pozzan (2007) 209 FLR 233; Hillam v Iacullo (2015) 90 NSWLR 422; ICTA Investments Pty Ltd T/A Jolly Roger & Anor v GE Commercial Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd & Anor [2006] NSWCA 290; In re Perkins; Poyse…
Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v Daniel Cuitanovic as trustee of the bankrupt estate of Kosta Dimitrovski [2013] NSWSC 722
Citation 8 (Para 15)

…v Daniel Cuitanovic as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Dimitrovski [2013] NSWSC 722 at [15] to [19] per Slattery J and, by parity of reasoning, Savieri v Brown [2008] NSWSC 1210 at [29] to [33] per White J). In such cases, the claimant is seeking to enforce a remedy being a right to possession. To enforce a righ…
Hanshaw v National Australia Bank Ltd [2012] NSWCA 100
Citation 9 (Para 35)

…d property fall within s 58(5) (see Hanshaw v National Australia Bank [2012] NSWCA 100 at [35] to [43] per Young JA, Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Daniel Cuitanovic as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Dimitrovski [2013] NSWSC 722 at [15] to [19] per Slattery J and, by parity of reasoning, Savieri v Brown [2008]…
400 George Street (Qld) Pty Ltd v BG International Ltd [2010] QCA 245
Citation 10

…y reference to the contents of the instrument under consideration” (see 400 George Street (Qld) Pty Ltd v BG International Ltd [2010] 2 Qd R 302; [2010] QCA 245 (“ 400 George Street ”) at [32]). The submissions of the parties accorded with that approach.”…
Savieri v Brown [2008] NSWSC 1210
Citation 11 (Para 29)

…] to [19] per Slattery J and, by parity of reasoning, Savieri v Brown [2008] NSWSC 1210 at [29] to [33] per White J). In such cases, the claimant is seeking to enforce a remedy being a right to possession. To enforce a right of possession for the purposes of sale is treated as an act of realization of the relevant s…
McIntosh v Linke Nominees Pty Ltd [2008] QCA 275
Citation 12

…Ch D 182; Jowitt v Callaghan (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 512; McIntosh & Anor as T’ees of the Estate of Camm (A Bankrupt) v Linke Nominees P/L & Anor [2008] QCA 275; Melbourne Property Group Pty Ltd v SC Australia Pty Ltd and Ors [2013] VSC 701; Morris Finance v Brown (2017) FCAFC 97; Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright…
Mango Media Pty Ltd v Velingos [2008] NSWSC 202
Citation 13 (Para 14)

…h there would be no security interest (see Mango Media Pty Ltd v Velingos [2008] NSWSC 202 at [14] and [15] per Barrett J and Scott v Bagshaw (2000) 99 FCR 573 at [25] per Drummond, RD Nicholson and Katz JJ). 42.Accordingly, if s 58(5) did not apply, then Morris Finance needed leave under s 58(3)(b). The question t…
Gibbons v Pozzan [2007] HCATrans 422
Citation 14

…59 (Supreme Court of Canada); Custom Credit Corp Ltd v Gray [1992] 1 VR 540; G Scammell and Nephew Ltd v Ouston [1941] AC 251; Gibbons v Pozzan (2007) 209 FLR 233; Hillam v Iacullo (2015) 90 NSWLR 422; ICTA Investments Pty Ltd T/A Jolly Roger & Anor v GE Commercial Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd & Anor [2006] NSWCA…
Gibbons v Pozzan [2007] SASC 99
Citation 15

…65The Court also said at paragraph 62: “62.Counsel for Aurora referred the Court to Gibbons v Pozzan (2007) 209 FLR 233; [2007] SASC 99, a decision of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia. In that case, an issue arose as to whether a loan agreement, that had been signed for a company by its sole…
ICTA Investments Pty. Ltd. trading as Jolly Roger & Anor. v. GE Commercial Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. & Anor. [2006] NSWCA 290
Citation 16

…3; Hillam v Iacullo (2015) 90 NSWLR 422; ICTA Investments Pty Ltd T/A Jolly Roger & Anor v GE Commercial Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd & Anor [2006] NSWCA 290; In re Perkins; Poyser v Beyfus [1898] 2 Ch D 182; Jowitt v Callaghan (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 512; McIntosh & Anor as T’ees of the Estate of Camm (A Bankrupt) v…
Scott v Bagshaw [2002] FCA 276
Citation 17 (Para 25)

…ingos [2008] NSWSC 202 at [14] and [15] per Barrett J and Scott v Bagshaw (2000) 99 FCR 573 at [25] per Drummond, RD Nicholson and Katz JJ). 42.Accordingly, if s 58(5) did not apply, then Morris Finance needed leave under s 58(3)(b). The question then is whether s 58(5) applies. In our view it does and we respectful…
Scott v Bagshaw [2000] FCA 816
Citation 18 (Para 14)

…ia Pty Ltd v Velingos [2008] NSWSC 202 at [14] and [15] per Barrett J and Scott v Bagshaw (2000) 99 FCR 573 at [25] per Drummond, RD Nicholson and Katz JJ). 42.Accordingly, if s 58(5) did not apply, then Morris Finance needed leave under s 58(3)(b). The question then is whether s 58(5) applies. In our view it does and we…
Technical Products Pty Ltd v State Government Insurance Office (Qld) [1989] HCA 24
Citation 19

…bt ( Technical Products Pty Ltd v State Government Insurance Office (Qld) (1989) 167 CLR 45 at 47 per Brennan, Deane and Gaudron JJ), we consider that there is the necessary link, as the primary judge correctly found (see at [23]). The proceeding seeks to enforce the equitable charge(s) which itself secures payment…
Melbourne Property Group Pty Ltd v SC Australia Pty Ltd [2013] VSC 701
Citation 20

…f the Estate of Camm (A Bankrupt) v Linke Nominees P/L & Anor [2008] QCA 275; Melbourne Property Group Pty Ltd v SC Australia Pty Ltd and Ors [2013] VSC 701; Morris Finance v Brown (2017) FCAFC 97; Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; Newcomb v Newcomb (1934) NSW STRAP 44; (…

AI Chat coming soon