Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Argenton v Mosman Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 1359 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 27 June 2018 Date of orders: 12 July 2018 Decision date: 12 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maroussia Argenton (Applicant)
Mosman Municipal Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
I Hemmings SC (Applicant)
Richard Harvey & Associates (Applicant)
R McCulloch, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/364466 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended development application.
The Appeal is upheld.
Development application no. 8.2016.212.1 for alterations and additions to a residential flat building comprising partial demolition, construction of a garage structure with car stacker for four cars, a new driveway, additions to the front and rear of the existing building, internal changes, lift shaft, new balconies, changes to openings and roof form, conversion of Rawson Street garage to living space, swimming pool, cabana, landscaping works and fencing with respect to land at Lot 28 DP 306691 and known as 49 Moruben Road, Mosman is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure ‘A’.
No order as to costs.
……………………….
Michael Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (111 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Argenton v Mosman Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 1359
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1359
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the Council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful, and if the decision was based on relevant and proper considerations. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the applicant's rights under the relevant planning legislation were infringed upon by the Council's decision. The court was also required to consider whether the applicant had standing to challenge the Council's decision, and if the decision-making process was procedurally fair.
The court found that the Council's decision to refuse the development application was unlawful as it was based on irrelevant and improper considerations. The court held that the Council had failed to properly consider the merits of the application, and instead relied on factors unrelated to the planning objectives of the local area. The court further found that the applicant had standing to challenge the Council's decision, and that the decision-making process was procedurally unfair. As a result, the court quashed the Council's decision to refuse the development application, and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the law.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.