Administrative Decisions Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: ARF v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation. [2013] NSWADT 241 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 29 October 2013 Jurisdiction: Victims Support Division Before: P H Molony, Judicial Member Decision: 1, Leave to lodge an appeal out of time with respect to claim 112481 is refused.
2. The notice of appeal with respect to claims 112483 and 119432 is dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Catchwords: Victim Support and Rehabilitation - application for leave to lodge an appeal out of time - leave refused - jurisdiction Legislation Cited: Victim Support and Rehabilitation Act 1996
Victims Rights and Support Act 2013Cases Cited: Foulkes v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation
Yacoub v Pilkington (Australia) Limited (2007) NSWCA 290Category: Principal judgment Parties: ARF (Applicant)
Victims Compensation Fund (Respondent)File Number(s): 137014 Publication restriction: s 126 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 applies
reasons for decision
Background
ARF sought to appeal three determinations made by a Compensation Assessor on 20 June 2008 dismissing claims for victims' compensation brought by him. Those three determinations related to acts of violence being:
- A home invasion and assault on 25 and 26 Februarys 2004 (claim 112481).
- An assault at bus stop on 15 February 2004 (claim 112483).
- An assault with brake and enter on 25 October 2004 (claim 119432).
In each case the Compensation Assessor was not satisfied that ARF had demonstrated an act of violence as he contended.
ARF subsequently appealed to the Victims Compensation Tribunal (VCT) against the decisions with respect to claims 112483 and 119432. On 21 August 2008 the VCT dismissed his appeal with respect to claim 112483. The VCT awarded him victims compensation of $8,010 with respect to claim 119432, but the whole of that amount was set-off against a previous restitution order made against ARF in accordance with s 31 of the Victims Support and Rehabilitation Act 1996 (the old Act).
On 12 October 2012 ARF filed a notice of appeal with the VCT in which he sought to appeal, "all the cases I made a claim for." He attached a discharge summary from John Hunter Hospital with respect to treatment he received following an assault on 5 October 2012 (the discharge summary). On the document ARF had written -
Like legal action taken on this assault to (sic) please. No legal representation.
On 29 October 2012 the VCT wrote to him advising that he had previously appealed the decisions with respect to claims 112483 and 119432. If he was dissatisfied with the result his remedy was an appeal to the District Court under s 39 of the old Act.
On 26 October 2012 the Registrar of the VCT wrote to ARF regarding claim 112481 acknowledging receipt of the appeal and advising he would need to provide, "submissions in relation to exceptional circumstances for lodging the appeal out of time" by 22 November 2012. He was also sent a copy of the VCT's information sheet entitled, "Leave to appeal out of time."…
Continue reading ARF v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- ARF v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation [2013] NSWADT 241
- Case
- [2013] NSWADT 241
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
1, Leave to lodge an appeal out of time with respect to claim 112481 is refused.
2. The notice of appeal with respect to claims 112483 and 119432 is dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.