Archibuild Australia v Council of the City of Sydney

Case [1988] NSWLEC 8


Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Archibuild Australia v Council of the City of Sydney [1988] NSWLEC 8
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Archibuild Australia

RESPONDENT
Council of the City of Sydney

FILE NUMBER(S): 20625 of 1987
CORAM: Hemmings J
KEY ISSUES: :-
LEGISLATION CITED:
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING:
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
07/08/1988
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:


JUDGMENT:

HIS HONOUR: The respondent Council makes application for orders that the orders of this court made on 26th February, 1988 in this matter be "set aside", or alternatively that the time in which an appeal therefrom may be instituted be extended pursuant to Div.8 s.17 of the Land & Environment Court Rules. The said orders were made after the determination of an objection by an Assessor on the same date.

The applicant appeared by an agent and the transcript indicates that there was no appearance of the respondent, that this absence was noted but no evidence given as to service, and after a short hearing the application was upheld.

The applicant again appears by the same agent and at issue is whether the learned Assessor should have made an enquiry as to whether the non-appearance of the respondent was a consequence of proper service or service at all of the application. I note that the file does not contain a notice of appearance, nor any record of an appearance prior to the matter being listed for hearing. The respondent submits that the learned Assessor thereby made an error of law and denied it "procedural fairness".

I am satisfied that an arguable and important question of law is raised and that, in the circumstances, this is an appropriate case to extend time for making of the appeal. It is also clear that the applicant should not be further disadvantaged by delay and that the hearing of this appeal be expedited.

I order:

1. That time for the institution of an appeal in this matter be extended.

2. The time for service of notice of appeal be abridged.

3. Hearing of such appeal set for 13th July, 1988 before Holland J.

4. Costs reserved.

Details
AGLC
Archibuild Australia v Council of the City of Sydney [1988] NSWLEC 8
Case
[1988] NSWLEC 8
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Archibuild Australia sought to appeal a decision of the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, which had ruled on an objection raised by the Council of the City of Sydney. The primary issue before the court was whether the initial hearing, where the Council did not appear, was conducted with procedural fairness. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the assessor should have made inquiries regarding the service of the application to the Council before proceeding with the hearing in the absence of the Council.

The court found that the Council had not appeared in the initial hearing, and its absence was noted in the transcript without any evidence of service. The Council argued that this procedural lapse constituted an error of law and a denial of procedural fairness. The court considered these arguments and concluded that an arguable and significant question of law was involved. Given the circumstances, the court found it appropriate to extend the time for the institution of the appeal. Furthermore, the court decided to expedite the hearing of the appeal to mitigate any further delay to the applicant and ordered that the hearing be set for a specific date before another judge.

The court's judgment included several orders: it extended the time for the institution of the appeal, abridged the time for service of the notice of appeal, scheduled the appeal hearing, and reserved costs for later determination. This decision ensures that the appeal process continues without undue prejudice to the applicant while allowing the court to address the procedural concerns raised by the Council.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.