FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Arbabun v Comptroller-General of Customs [2018] FCA 2105
File number(s): VID 86 of 2017 Judge(s): WHEELAHAN J Date of judgment: 21 December 2018 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to file an amended defence to a further amended statement of claim – application to withdraw an admission – application to file an amended notice of cross claim – directions made. Legislation: Customs Act 1901 (Cth) s 30(1)(a)(ii), 68(3), 68(3A), 205C
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.55, 26.11
General Rules of Procedure in Civil Proceedings (Vic) r 25.02
Cases cited: Collie v Merlaw Nominees Pty Ltd (2001) 37 ACSR 361
Cooper’s Brewery Ltd v Panfida Foods Ltd (1992) 26 NSWLR 738
Divcon (Australia) Pty Ltd v Devine Shipping Pty Ltd [1996] 2 VR 79
Kitano v The Commonwealth (1974) 129 CLR 151
Yarrabee Chicken Company Pty Ltd v Steggles Limited [2010] FCA 394
Zien v R (1986) 26 DLR (4th) 121
Date of hearing: 17 December 2018 Registry: Victoria Division: General Division National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 18 Counsel for the Applicants: Ms L Papaelia Solicitor for the Applicants: Judicate Lawyers Counsel for the First and Third Respondents: Ms Z Maud Solicitor for the First and Third Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting appearance ORDERS
VID 86 of 2017 BETWEEN: MAHMOOD ARBABUN
First Applicant
MASOUD ABBASNEJAD HAQIQI
Second Applicant
AND: COMPTROLLER-GENERAL OF CUSTOMS
First Respondent
MAGISTRATE PATRICK SOUTHEY
Second Respondent
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Third Respondent
AND BETWEEN: COMPTROLLER-GENERAL OF CUSTOMS
Cross-Claimant
AND: MAHMOOD ARBABUN (and another named in the Schedule)
First Cross-Respondent
JUDGE:
WHEELAHAN J
DATE OF ORDER:
20 DECEMBER 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.On or before 31 January 2019, counsel for the parties confer and submit a minute of order for the Court’s consideration that addresses the resolution of the contested issues and provides for other directions that the parties desire to prepare the case for hearing.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
WHEELAHAN J:
Introduction
These reasons relate to a number of issues that were raised for determination at a case management hearing on 17 December 2018. The matters that remained in issue at the conclusion of the hearing were –
(a)an application by the respondents to file an amended defence to the further amended statement of claim;
(b)an application by the respondents to withdraw an admission in their defence to the further amended statement of claim, if such an application was necessary;
(c)an application by the cross-claimant for leave to file an amended notice of cross-claim; and
(d)an application by the applicants for discovery of documents.
Pleadings
The applicants commenced this proceeding on 9 February 2017 against the first respondent (the Comptroller-General), who at that time was the sole respondent. The second and third respondents were later added to the proceeding.
The subject matter of…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Arbabun v Comptroller-General of Customs and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2018] FCA 2105
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the plaintiff was entitled to file an amended defence to a further amended statement of claim, whether the plaintiff could withdraw an admission, and whether the plaintiff was entitled to file an amended notice of cross claim. The court also had to consider the appropriate conditions to impose on the plaintiff's applications and whether the case should proceed to hearing. The court had to balance the need for the parties to be able to fully and fairly present their cases against the need to manage the proceedings efficiently and to avoid unnecessary delay.
The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to file an amended defence, subject to certain conditions, including the payment of costs and a direction that the plaintiff file a further amended defence within a specified time. The court also found that the plaintiff was entitled to withdraw an admission, subject to the payment of costs and the direction that the plaintiff file an amended notice of cross claim within a specified time. The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to file an amended notice of cross claim, subject to the payment of costs and the direction that the case proceed to hearing. The court made directions for the parties to confer and submit a minute of order that addressed the resolution of the contested issues and provided for other directions that the parties desired to prepare the case for hearing.
The court's final orders included a direction that the parties confer and submit a minute of order for the Court’s consideration that addressed the resolution of the contested issues and provided for other directions that the parties desired to prepare the case for hearing. The court also directed that the plaintiff file a further amended defence and an amended notice of cross claim within specified times and that the plaintiff pay certain costs. The court made clear that entry of orders was dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. On or before 31 January 2019, counsel for the parties confer and submit a minute of order for the Court’s consideration that addresses the resolution of the contested issues and provides for other directions that the parties desire to prepare the case for hearing.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.