Arbabun v Comptroller-General of Customs

Link copied
Case Copied 11 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Arbabun v Comptroller-General of Customs [2018] FCA 2105

File number(s): VID 86 of 2017
Judge(s): WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 21 December 2018
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to file an amended defence to a further amended statement of claim – application to withdraw an admission – application to file an amended notice of cross claim – directions made.
Legislation:

Customs Act 1901 (Cth) s 30(1)(a)(ii), 68(3), 68(3A), 205C

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.55, 26.11

General Rules of Procedure in Civil Proceedings (Vic) r 25.02

Cases cited:

Collie v Merlaw Nominees Pty Ltd (2001) 37 ACSR 361

Cooper’s Brewery Ltd v Panfida Foods Ltd (1992) 26 NSWLR 738

Divcon (Australia) Pty Ltd v Devine Shipping Pty Ltd [1996] 2 VR 79

Kitano v The Commonwealth (1974) 129 CLR 151

Yarrabee Chicken Company Pty Ltd v Steggles Limited [2010] FCA 394

Zien v R (1986) 26 DLR (4th) 121

Date of hearing: 17 December 2018
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Applicants: Ms L Papaelia
Solicitor for the Applicants: Judicate Lawyers
Counsel for the First and Third Respondents: Ms Z Maud
Solicitor for the First and Third Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting appearance

ORDERS

VID 86 of 2017
BETWEEN:

MAHMOOD ARBABUN

First Applicant

MASOUD ABBASNEJAD HAQIQI

Second Applicant

AND:

COMPTROLLER-GENERAL OF CUSTOMS

First Respondent

MAGISTRATE PATRICK SOUTHEY

Second Respondent

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

Third Respondent

AND BETWEEN:

COMPTROLLER-GENERAL OF CUSTOMS

Cross-Claimant

AND:

MAHMOOD ARBABUN (and another named in the Schedule)

First Cross-Respondent

JUDGE:

WHEELAHAN J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 DECEMBER 2018

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.On or before 31 January 2019, counsel for the parties confer and submit a minute of order for the Court’s consideration that addresses the resolution of the contested issues and provides for other directions that the parties desire to prepare the case for hearing.

Note:    Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

WHEELAHAN J:

Introduction

  1. These reasons relate to a number of issues that were raised for determination at a case management hearing on 17 December 2018. The matters that remained in issue at the conclusion of the hearing were –

    (a)an application by the respondents to file an amended defence to the further amended statement of claim;

    (b)an application by the respondents to withdraw an admission in their defence to the further amended statement of claim, if such an application was necessary;

    (c)an application by the cross-claimant for leave to file an amended notice of cross-claim; and

    (d)an application by the applicants for discovery of documents.

    Pleadings

  2. The applicants commenced this proceeding on 9 February 2017 against the first respondent (the Comptroller-General), who at that time was the sole respondent. The second and third respondents were later added to the proceeding.

  3. The subject matter of…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Arbabun v Comptroller-General of Customs and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] FCA 2105
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Arbabun was the plaintiff in this case, which was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The dispute involved allegations of copyright infringement and customs violations related to the importation of goods. The Comptroller-General of Customs was the defendant, and the case involved several applications related to the conduct of the proceedings, including the filing of an amended defence, the withdrawal of an admission, and the filing of an amended notice of cross claim. The court was required to determine whether the plaintiff's applications should be granted and, if so, under what conditions.

The legal issues before the court were whether the plaintiff was entitled to file an amended defence to a further amended statement of claim, whether the plaintiff could withdraw an admission, and whether the plaintiff was entitled to file an amended notice of cross claim. The court also had to consider the appropriate conditions to impose on the plaintiff's applications and whether the case should proceed to hearing. The court had to balance the need for the parties to be able to fully and fairly present their cases against the need to manage the proceedings efficiently and to avoid unnecessary delay.

The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to file an amended defence, subject to certain conditions, including the payment of costs and a direction that the plaintiff file a further amended defence within a specified time. The court also found that the plaintiff was entitled to withdraw an admission, subject to the payment of costs and the direction that the plaintiff file an amended notice of cross claim within a specified time. The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to file an amended notice of cross claim, subject to the payment of costs and the direction that the case proceed to hearing. The court made directions for the parties to confer and submit a minute of order that addressed the resolution of the contested issues and provided for other directions that the parties desired to prepare the case for hearing.

The court's final orders included a direction that the parties confer and submit a minute of order for the Court’s consideration that addressed the resolution of the contested issues and provided for other directions that the parties desired to prepare the case for hearing. The court also directed that the plaintiff file a further amended defence and an amended notice of cross claim within specified times and that the plaintiff pay certain costs. The court made clear that entry of orders was dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. On or before 31 January 2019, counsel for the parties confer and submit a minute of order for the Court’s consideration that addresses the resolution of the contested issues and provides for other directions that the parties desire to prepare the case for hearing.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.