Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Arambatzis v Foundas (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 125 Hearing dates: 1 June 2021 Date of orders: 1 June 2021 Decision date: 01 June 2021 Before: Brereton JA Decision: (1) Execution of the writ for possession issued under the order made on 7 January 2021 be further stayed until 6 July 2021 or earlier further order;
(2) Pursuant to UCPR, r 7.36, the Court refers Mrs Foundas to the Registrar for referral to a barrister or solicitor on the pro bono panel for legal assistance generally in relation to the proceedings, and directs the Registrar to provide to the barrister or solicitor appointed a copy of my judgment of 1 March 2021; and
(3) The proceedings be adjourned to the Court of Appeal Registrar's List on 5 July 2021.
Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – Court of Appeal – Stay of execution of writ for possession – Further stay – Where little progress made since initial stay – Where pro bono referral unavailing – Where applicant did not have published reasons for judgment regarding previous stay – Where original document constituting fresh evidence with indicia of authenticity raising serious question of miscarriage of justice in decision below said to have been sent to Court – Stay extended – Where any further extension will require very prompt steps to progress proceedings
CIVIL PROCEDURE – Representation – Unrepresented litigant – Pro bono referral – Second referral – Special reasons – Where barrister on first referral did not have benefit of published reasons for judgment regarding previous stay – Referral madeLegislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66G
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.36
Cases Cited: Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Proceedings 2018/184682
Proceedings 2020/351791
Peter Arambatzis (Plaintiff/Applicant)
Cassiani Foundas (Defendant/Respondent)
Bill Foundas (Plaintiff/Applicant)
Sean Magnus Wengel (First Defendant/First Respondent)
Robert William Whitton (Second Defendant/Second Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Proceedings 2018/184682
Ms T Harris-Roxas (Plaintiff/Applicant)
Self-represented (Defendant/Respondent)Proceedings 2020/351791
Self-represented (Plaintiff/Applicant)
W K Soon (Second Defendant/Second Respondent)Solicitors:
Proceedings 2020/351791
Proceedings 2018/184682
Cutri & Associates (Plaintiff/Applicant)
William Roberts Lawyers (Defendant/Respondents)
File Number(s): 2018/184682;
2020/351791Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction:
- Equity
- Citation:
n/a
- Date of Decision:
- 7 January 2021; 11 February 2021
- Before:
- Darke J
- File Number(s):
- 2018/184682;
2020/351791
Judgment (ex tempORE)
-
For the reasons I am about to give, I propose to extend the stay of execution of the writ of possession for a period of one month, and to make a further referral for pro bono assistance. It will be essential, if that stay is to be further extended, for Mrs Foundas to have taken appropriate action well in advance of the date on which it expires.
-
On 1 March 2021, for reasons given orally that day,[1] I ordered that execution of a writ of possession which had issued under an order for possession made on 7 January 2021 be stayed until 2…
Continue reading Arambatzis v Foundas (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Arambatzis v Foundas (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 125
- Case
- [2021] NSWCA 125
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Court were whether to grant a further stay of execution of the writ for possession, and whether to make a further referral to the pro bono panel for legal assistance. The Court was also required to consider the implications of fresh evidence, described as an original document with indicia of authenticity, which purportedly raised a serious question of a miscarriage of justice in the decision below and was said to have been sent to the Court.
Brereton JA granted the further stay of execution of the writ for possession until 6 July 2021 or an earlier further order. His Honour reasoned that the fresh evidence, which suggested a potential miscarriage of justice, warranted the extension of the stay. The Court also made a referral, pursuant to UCPR r 7.36, to the Registrar for Mrs Foundas to be referred to a barrister or solicitor on the pro bono panel for legal assistance. The Registrar was directed to provide a copy of the judgment of 1 March 2021 to the appointed legal practitioner. The proceedings were adjourned to the Court of Appeal Registrar's List on 5 July 2021, with a clear indication that any further extension would necessitate very prompt steps to progress the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Execution of the writ for possession issued under the order made on 7 January 2021 be further stayed until 6 July 2021 or earlier further order;
(2) Pursuant to UCPR, r 7.36, the Court refers Mrs Foundas to the Registrar for referral to a barrister or solicitor on the pro bono panel for legal assistance generally in relation to the proceedings, and directs the Registrar to provide to the barrister or solicitor appointed a copy of my judgment of 1 March 2021; and
(3) The proceedings be adjourned to the Court of Appeal Registrar's List on 5 July 2021.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.