Arambatzis v Foundas (No 2)

Case [2021] NSWCA 125


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Arambatzis v Foundas (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 125
Hearing dates: 1 June 2021
Date of orders: 1 June 2021
Decision date: 01 June 2021
Before: Brereton JA
Decision:

(1) Execution of the writ for possession issued under the order made on 7 January 2021 be further stayed until 6 July 2021 or earlier further order;

(2) Pursuant to UCPR, r 7.36, the Court refers Mrs Foundas to the Registrar for referral to a barrister or solicitor on the pro bono panel for legal assistance generally in relation to the proceedings, and directs the Registrar to provide to the barrister or solicitor appointed a copy of my judgment of 1 March 2021; and

(3) The proceedings be adjourned to the Court of Appeal Registrar's List on 5 July 2021.

Catchwords:

JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – Court of Appeal – Stay of execution of writ for possession – Further stay – Where little progress made since initial stay – Where pro bono referral unavailing – Where applicant did not have published reasons for judgment regarding previous stay – Where original document constituting fresh evidence with indicia of authenticity raising serious question of miscarriage of justice in decision below said to have been sent to Court – Stay extended – Where any further extension will require very prompt steps to progress proceedings

CIVIL PROCEDURE – Representation – Unrepresented litigant – Pro bono referral – Second referral – Special reasons – Where barrister on first referral did not have benefit of published reasons for judgment regarding previous stay – Referral made
Legislation Cited:

Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66G

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.36

Cases Cited:

Arambatzis v Foundas; Foundas v Wengel [2020] NSWCA 78

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties:

Proceedings 2018/184682
Peter Arambatzis (Plaintiff/Applicant)
Cassiani Foundas (Defendant/Respondent)

Proceedings 2020/351791
Bill Foundas (Plaintiff/Applicant)
Sean Magnus Wengel (First Defendant/First Respondent)
Robert William Whitton (Second Defendant/Second Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Proceedings 2018/184682
Ms T Harris-Roxas (Plaintiff/Applicant)
Self-represented (Defendant/Respondent)

Proceedings 2020/351791
Self-represented (Plaintiff/Applicant)
W K Soon (Second Defendant/Second Respondent)

Solicitors:
Proceedings 2018/184682
Cutri & Associates (Plaintiff/Applicant)

Proceedings 2020/351791
William Roberts Lawyers (Defendant/Respondents)
File Number(s): 2018/184682;
2020/351791
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Equity
Citation:

n/a

Date of Decision:
7 January 2021; 11 February 2021
Before:
Darke J
File Number(s):
2018/184682;
2020/351791

Judgment (ex tempORE)

  1. For the reasons I am about to give, I propose to extend the stay of execution of the writ of possession for a period of one month, and to make a further referral for pro bono assistance. It will be essential, if that stay is to be further extended, for Mrs Foundas to have taken appropriate action well in advance of the date on which it expires.

  2. On 1 March 2021, for reasons given orally that day,[1] I ordered that execution of a writ of possession which had issued under an order for possession made on 7 January 2021 be stayed until 2…

Continue reading Arambatzis v Foundas (No 2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Arambatzis v Foundas (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 125
Case
[2021] NSWCA 125
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Arambatzis v Foundas (No 2)*, the Court of Appeal considered an application for a further stay of execution of a writ for possession. The applicant, Mrs Foundas, sought this stay in circumstances where limited progress had been made since an initial stay was granted, and a pro bono referral had proven unavailing. The applicant also contended that she did not have access to the published reasons for judgment concerning the previous stay.

The central legal issues before the Court were whether to grant a further stay of execution of the writ for possession, and whether to make a further referral to the pro bono panel for legal assistance. The Court was also required to consider the implications of fresh evidence, described as an original document with indicia of authenticity, which purportedly raised a serious question of a miscarriage of justice in the decision below and was said to have been sent to the Court.

Brereton JA granted the further stay of execution of the writ for possession until 6 July 2021 or an earlier further order. His Honour reasoned that the fresh evidence, which suggested a potential miscarriage of justice, warranted the extension of the stay. The Court also made a referral, pursuant to UCPR r 7.36, to the Registrar for Mrs Foundas to be referred to a barrister or solicitor on the pro bono panel for legal assistance. The Registrar was directed to provide a copy of the judgment of 1 March 2021 to the appointed legal practitioner. The proceedings were adjourned to the Court of Appeal Registrar's List on 5 July 2021, with a clear indication that any further extension would necessitate very prompt steps to progress the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Execution of the writ for possession issued under the order made on 7 January 2021 be further stayed until 6 July 2021 or earlier further order;

(2) Pursuant to UCPR, r 7.36, the Court refers Mrs Foundas to the Registrar for referral to a barrister or solicitor on the pro bono panel for legal assistance generally in relation to the proceedings, and directs the Registrar to provide to the barrister or solicitor appointed a copy of my judgment of 1 March 2021; and

(3) The proceedings be adjourned to the Court of Appeal Registrar's List on 5 July 2021.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.