Aptiix Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 33


[2025] FWCA 33

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

Aptiix Pty Ltd

(AG2024/5006)

APTIIX PTY LTD & ETU GREENFIELDS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024 – 2025

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER REDFORD

MELBOURNE, 6 JANUARY 2025

Application for approval of the Aptiix Pty Ltd & ETU Greenfields Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2025

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Aptiix Pty Ltd & ETU Greenfields Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Aptiix Pty Ltd.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertaking is attached at Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.  The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s 172(2)(b) of the Act. Noting the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval has been met. In accordance with s 187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (ETU), is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement as required by s 187(5)(b).

  1. Pursuant to s 53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the ETU and that the Agreement covers this organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act will operate from 7 days after the date of approval.
      

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE527499  PR782986>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Aptiix Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 33
Case
[2025] FWCA 33
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Aptiix Pty Ltd, an employer, filed an application seeking approval for the Aptiix Pty Ltd & ETU Greenfields Enterprise Agreement 2024-2025. The Enterprise Bargaining Agreement (EBA) was contested by the Electrical Trades Union (ETU), representing the employees, on various grounds, including that the agreement did not meet the requirements for better-off-overall-tests (BOOT) as mandated by the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute centred around whether the proposed terms of the EBA provided employees with sufficient financial benefits compared to their existing conditions to qualify as a BOOT.

The central legal issue for the Commission was whether the proposed EBA met the statutory requirement of being "better-off-overall" for employees. This involved assessing the financial and non-financial terms of the agreement against the current conditions to determine if the new terms provided an overall improvement. The Commission also considered whether the agreement complied with the procedural requirements set out in the Fair Work Act.

The Commission examined the financial components of the proposed agreement, including wages, allowances, and other entitlements. It found that the proposed EBA did indeed provide employees with increased wages and other benefits, which, when considered in totality, resulted in a BOOT. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement complied with the procedural requirements, including the appropriate consultation processes and the inclusion of necessary details. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, finding that it met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act.

In approving the agreement, the Commission made orders that the Aptiix Pty Ltd & ETU Greenfields Enterprise Agreement 2024-2025 be approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act. This decision confirmed that the proposed terms provided employees with sufficient financial and non-financial benefits to qualify as a BOOT and met all procedural requirements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.