Application by Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited
[2016] FWC 724
•5 February 2016
[2016] FWC 724
DECISION
Fair Work Act 2009 s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and
transferring employees
Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited T/A Toyota Motor
Corporation Australia
(AG2016/2194)
Vehicle industry
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY MELBOURNE, 5 FEBRUARY 2016 Application for an order in relation to transfer of business - Transferrable instrument -
Application that transferrable instrument not cover transferring employees - Conditional offer
of employment - Application not opposed – Fair Work Act 2009, ss. 311, 312, 317 and 318.
Introduction
[1] The Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited T/A Toyota Motor Corporation
Australia has applied under s.318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for an order that the
Toyota Technical Centre Australia Agreement 2006 not apply to Aya Ling, Martin Zandbergs
and Reiko Little (the transferring employees) who are employed by the Toyota Technical
Centre Australia Pty Ltd under the TTCA Agreement.
[2] There is no dispute that the employees are transferring employees. TMCA and TTCA
are associated entities, or have a connection by virtue of their status as related bodies
1
corporate, as that term is defined by s.50AAA of the Corporations Act 2001.
Background
[3] In July 2016, TTCA will cease performing the Technical Translation and Job Request
Coordinator and the Workshop Vehicle Fleet Coordinator functions of its business. As a
result, the positions of the transferring employees will no longer be required to be performed
by anyone at TTCA.
[4] From July 2016, the functions will be transferred to, and be performed by, TMCA.
[5] TMCA wishes to offer employment to the transferring employees however the offers
of employment are conditional upon an order pursuant to s.318 of the Act being in place.
[2016] FWC 724
Relevant legislation
[6] Part 2-8 of the Act describes when a transfer of business occurs and provides for the
transfer of enterprise agreements, certain modern awards and certain other instruments if there
is a transfer of business from one employer to another employer. Division 3 of Part 2-8
provides the Commission with the power to make orders that an enterprise agreement that
would otherwise apply to transferring employees because there was a transfer of business, not
apply.
[7] The making of an order is discretionary and in making any order that an enterprise
agreement that would otherwise apply to transferring employees the Commission must take
into account the following:
(3) In deciding whether to make the order, FWC must take into account the following:
(a) the views of:
(i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and
(ii) the employees who would be affected by the order; (b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;
(c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;
(d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;
(e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new
employer;
(f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;
(g) the public interest.
Transfer of the TTCA Agreement
[8] TMCA submitted that the proposed orders should be made in order to facilitate the
transfer of the transferring employees’ employment.
[9] TMCA submitted that the transferring employees were each provided with a letter of
offer, a letter detailing its intention to make this application to the Commission and a
declaration form for them to complete, indicating whether they supported TMCA’s
application for an order that the TTCA Agreement not apply to their employment on transfer
[2016] FWC 724to TMCA. TMCA filed copies of the declarations signed by the transferring employees and
indicating their support of the application with the Commission.
[10] The transferring employees have accepted TMCA’s offer of employment and support
the application before the Commission.
[11] TMCA submitted that the transferring employees will not, on an overall basis, be
disadvantaged in relation to their terms and conditions of employment if the order was made.
The transferring employees will receive a higher base salary than they currently receive under
the TTCA Agreement, along with a car allowance as part of their fixed remuneration.
[12] TMCA submitted that the transferring employees will receive a higher superannuation
rate if they commenced employment with TMCA than they currently receive under the TTCA
Agreement.
[13] The transferring employees’ entitlements to annual leave, personal/carer’s leave,
compassionate leave and parental leave would remain the same and in accordance with the
provisions of the National Employment Standards in the Act.
[14] TMCA submitted that applying the TTCA Agreement to the transferring employees
would impose an economic disadvantage on TMCA by requiring it to establish separate
administrative arrangements to ensure it meets its obligations to the transferring employees,
which are separate to other employees who perform similar work. They submitted that this
would impose an administrative and cost burden on TMCA, resulting in operational
inefficiency.
[15] TMCA further submitted that if the TTCA Agreement were to apply to the transferring
employees’ employment with TMCA, it could create disharmony in the workplace as the
terms and conditions of the transferring employees’ employment would be different to other
employees performing the same work at the same classification level.
[16] On 27 January 2016, I caused an email to be sent to TMCA in which the TMCA were
asked to address s.318(3)(b) of the Act. I noted that if the application were granted, any
redundancy entitlement would be in accordance with the National Employment Standards and
the employees would no longer be entitled to the redundancy entitlements under the TTCA
Agreement which are significantly more generous. Further, long service leave under the
TTCA Agreement was also more generous. As a result, I was provided with further material
from TMCA which advised that employees would not be disadvantaged in respect to long
service leave and redundancy entitlements if the s.318 application was successful. TMCA
provided an undertaking to the Commission that the more beneficial long service leave
provisions would be preserved and that the employees would receive redundancy entitlements
no less beneficial than provided for in the TTCA Agreement. Upon receipt of that
undertaking, the transferring employees indicated their support for the application.
Conclusion
[17] I am satisfied that the TTCA Agreement is a transferable instrument.
[18] I have had regard to the views of the employees and the TMCA who support the
making of the order. I further note that the TTCA Agreement had a nominal expiry date of 25
[2016] FWC 724
July 2009. I accept the submissions of TMCA, given the undertaking, that the employees
would not be disadvantaged by the making of the order. I further accept the submissions that
requiring the TMCA to apply the TTCA Agreement would impose an economic disadvantage
as it would impose an administrative and cost burden on TMCA. I am not satisfied that it
would cause TMCA to incur a significant economic disadvantage. I further accept the
submissions of TMCA that it would be in the public interest to make the order sought.
[19] For the reasons above, I will make an order that the TTCA Agreement will not cover
the transferring employees during the period of their employment with TMCA.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
| Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer |
| <Price code A, AC302516 PR576701 > |
1
s.311(6) of the Act.
0
0
0