Application by Fueltrac Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 13 min read

COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL OF AUSTRALIA

Application by Fueltrac Pty Ltd [2018] ACopyT 2

File number: CT 3 of 2018
The Tribunal: GREENWOOD J (PRESIDENT)
Date of decision: 30 October 2018
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), ss 153E, 161, 183
Cases cited: Thomas v Brown (1997) 37 IPR 207
Date of hearing: 26 October 2018
Date of last submissions: 26 October 2018
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr D G Eliades
Solicitor for the Applicants: Broadley Rees Hogan
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms K Downes QC and Mr B W Wacker
Solicitor for the Respondent: Crown Solicitor

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Copyright Act 1968

IN THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL CT 3 of 2018
APPLICATION BY: FUELTRAC PTY LTD (ACN 089 259 834)
BETWEEN:

FUELTRAC PTY LTD (ACN 089 259 834)

Applicant

AND:

STATE OF QUEENSLAND

Respondent

TRIBUNAL:

GREENWOOD J (PRESIDENT)

DATE OF ORDER:

30 OCTOBER 2018

THE TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT:

1.The present proceedings be stayed pending the determination of all questions in issue the subject of proceedings to be commenced in the Federal Court of Australia by the present applicant. 

2.These directions and the reasons in support of these directions are published from the Chambers of the President. 


REASONS FOR DETERMINATION

GREENWOOD J (PRESIDENT):

  1. Section 183(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (the “Act”) provides, relevantly, that the copyright in a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work or a published edition of such a work, is not infringed by a State, or by a person authorised in writing by a State, doing any acts comprised in the copyright if the acts are done for the services of the State. Authority may be given under s 183(1) before or after the acts in respect of which the authority is given have been done, and may be given to a person notwithstanding that he or she has a licence granted by, or binding on, the owner of the copyright to do the acts: s 183(3).

  2. Section 183(4) provides that where an act comprised in a copyright has been done under s 183(1), the State shall, as soon as possible, unless it appears to the State that it would be contrary to the public interest to do so, inform the owner of the copyright of the doing of the act and furnish that person with such information as to the doing of the act as he or she from time to time reasonably requires. 

  3. Section 183(5)(1) provides that where an act comprised in a copyright has been done in reliance upon s 183(1), the terms for the doing of the act are such terms as are, whether before or after the act is done, agreed between the State and the owner of the copyright or, in default of agreement, as are fixed by the Copyright Tribunal (the “Tribunal”). 

  4. Section 153E of the Act provides, relevantly, that the parties to an application to the Tribunal under s 183(5) for the fixing of the terms for the doing of an act comprised in…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Application by Fueltrac Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] ACopyT 2
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Fueltrac Pty Ltd applied to the Copyright Tribunal for an order to protect its copyright. The dispute arose from the alleged infringement of Fueltrac's copyright by another party. The Copyright Tribunal heard the application and considered the legal issues that needed to be resolved. The primary legal issue was whether Fueltrac had a valid copyright claim that warranted protection from the Tribunal. Another issue was whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to grant the requested relief.

The Tribunal found that the copyright claim was complex and required determination by the Federal Court, which had exclusive jurisdiction over copyright matters. The Tribunal also noted that the Federal Court was better equipped to handle the intricacies of copyright law and the specific facts of the case. Therefore, the Tribunal decided to stay the present proceedings and direct Fueltrac to commence proceedings in the Federal Court. The Tribunal's decision was based on the need to avoid duplicative litigation and ensure that the copyright claim was decided by the appropriate court. The Tribunal also considered the potential prejudice to the other party if the proceedings were not stayed.

The Tribunal's orders were that the present proceedings be stayed pending the determination of all questions in issue in the Federal Court. The Tribunal also directed that these directions and the reasons in support of these directions be published from the Chambers of the President. The orders reflected the Tribunal's finding that the Federal Court was the appropriate forum for resolving the copyright dispute. The Tribunal's decision ensured that the copyright claim would be decided by a court with the necessary expertise and jurisdiction.

Orders

Orders of the court

THE TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT:

1. The present proceedings be stayed pending the determination of all questions in issue the subject of proceedings to be commenced in the Federal Court of Australia by the present applicant.

2. These directions and the reasons in support of these directions are published from the Chambers of the President.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.