Application by Australian Workers' Union, the
[2016] FWC 1825
•22 March 2016
[2016] FWC 1825
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 | |
| s.236—Majority support determination | |
| Australian Workers’ Union, The | |
| v | |
| RLA Polymers Pty Ltd | |
| (B2016/325) | |
| COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 22 MARCH 2016 |
Majority support determination - RLA Polymers Pty Ltd - 215 Colchester Road, Kilsyth VIC.
[1] This is an application under section 236 of the Fair Work Act 2009 by The Australian
Workers’ Union (AWU) for a majority support determination with respect to certain
employees employed by RLA Polymers Pty Ltd (the Respondent).
[2] The AWU seeks a determination that a majority of the employees who perform work
at the employer’s site at 215 Colchester Road, Kilsyth, Victoria, who will be covered by a
proposed single-enterprise agreement to be made with the Respondent wish to bargain with
their employer.
[3] Sections 236 and 237 of the Act set out the requirement for the making of a majority
support determination:
“236 Majority support determinations (1) A bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by a proposed single-enterprise agreement may apply to FWA for a determination (a majority
support determination) that a majority of the employees who will be covered by the
agreement want to bargain with the employer, or employers, that will be covered by
the agreement.
(2) The application must specify:
(a) the employer, or employers, that will be covered by the agreement; and (b) the employees who will be covered by the agreement. 237 When FWA must make a majority support determination Majority support determination
[2016] FWC 1825
(1) FWA must make a majority support determination in relation to a proposed single-enterprise agreement if:
(a) an application for the determination has been made; and (b) FWA is satisfied of the matters set out in subsection (2) in relation to the agreement.
Matters of which FWA must be satisfied before making a majority support
determination
(2) FWA must be satisfied that:
(a) a majority of the employees: (i) who are employed by the employer or employers at a time determined by FWA; and
(ii) who will be covered by the agreement; want to bargain; and
(b) the employer, or employers, that will be covered by the agreement have not yet agreed to bargain, or initiated bargaining, for the agreement; and
(c) that the group of employees who will be covered by the agreement was fairly chosen; and
(d) it is reasonable in all the circumstances to make the determination.
(3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(a), FWA may work out whether a majority of employees want to bargain using any method FWA considers appropriate.
(3A) If the agreement will not cover all of the employees of the employer or
employers covered by the agreement, FWA must, in deciding for the purposes of
paragraph (2)(c) whether the group of employees who will be covered was fairly
chosen, take into account whether the group is geographically, operationally or
organisationally distinct.
Operation of determination
(4) The determination comes into operation on the day on which it is made.”
[4] At the request of the Commission the AWU provided a copy of the petition that it had
circulated and which was signed by employees of the Respondent. The petition was as
follows:
“We the undersigned employees of RLA Polymers, Kilsyth, in the State of Victoria,
hereby signify that we wish to bargain collectively with our employer in relation to a
[2016] FWC 1825proposed enterprise agreement to cover employees engaged under the Manufacturing
and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2010.”
[5] At the request of the Commission the Respondent provided a list of its employees as at
14 February 2016. Some of the employees who signed the petition were listed on the
Respondent’s list of employees as being employed under the Storage Services Award. In
communications between the Commission and the AWU and the Respondent it became very
clear that the AWU was seeking a majority support determination in relation to employees
engaged in both manufacturing and warehousing and that the AWU considered that all
relevant employees were covered by the Manufacturing and Associated Industries and
Occupations Award 2010.
[6] To the extent necessary, I permitted the application to be amended so as to seek a
majority support determination in relation to an enterprise agreement which would cover both
manufacturing and warehouse employees.
[7] I have compared the list of names on the AWU petition against the list of names of
employees of the Respondent and against the list of names of persons who were working at
the premises of the Respondent on 14 January 2016 but who were employed by a labour hire
provider.
[8] I found that 31 out of the 60 relevant employees of the Respondent signed the petition.
There were an additional 6 names on the petition but these persons were not employees of the
Respondent but were employees of the labour hire provider. Also there was an additional
name on the AWU petition which was not on the list of employees nor on the list of labour
hire employees. Given that a majority of employees of the Respondent had signed the AWU
petition I do not need to consider the position of this extra person on the AWU petition.
[9] On the basis of the material put before me, I am satisfied that the AWU is a bargaining
representative for the employees concerned and is, therefore, capable of making the
application for a majority support determination. I am satisfied that a majority of the
employees employed by the Respondent who will be covered by the agreement want to
bargain. I am satisfied that the employer has not yet agreed to bargain or initiated bargaining
for the agreement.
[10] I am satisfied that the group of employees has been fairly chosen and, in all the
circumstances it being reasonable to do so, I will issue a majority support determination for
the employees concerned.
[11] A determination to this effect is issued today.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, PR578269>
[2016] FWC 1825
0
0
0