Applicants M42-2004 & Anor, Ex parte - Re MIMIA

Case

[2004] HCATrans 316

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2004] HCATrans 316

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry         
  Melbourne  No M42 of 2004

In the matter of -

An application for Writs of Certiorari and/or Prohibition or an Injunction and/or Mandamus against MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

First Respondent

JOHN VRACHNAS CONSTITUTING THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent

Ex parte –

APPLICANTS M42/2004

Applicants/Prosecutors

Office of the Registry         
  Melbourne  No M43 of 2004

In the matter of -

An application for Writs of Certiorari and/or Prohibition or an Injunction and/or Mandamus against MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

First Respondent

JOHN VRACHNAS CONSTITUTING THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent

Ex parte –

APPLICANT M43/2004

Applicant/Prosecutor

HAYNE J

(In Chambers)

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT MELBOURNE ON TUESDAY, 24 AUGUST 2004, AT 9.33 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

__________________

MS D. RASHEVA:   May it please the Court, I appear on behalf of the applicants in these matters.  (instructed by Sulaika Dhanapala) 

MR S.P. DONAGHUE:   If the Court pleases, I appear for the first respondent.  (instructed by Clayton Utz).

MS RASHEVA:   Your Honour, we have consent minutes seeking to withdraw my client’s application and a consent as to costs.  If I could seek to hand those up.

HIS HONOUR:   Yes.  I think the Tribunal submits to the jurisdiction of the Court save as to costs.  You have seen these orders, have you not, Dr Donaghue?

MR DONAGHUE:   I have, yes.

HIS HONOUR:   In each of the matters there will be orders by consent that the applicants’ application for an order for writs of mandamus, prohibition or certiorari made by affidavit sworn on 10 March 2004 may be withdrawn.  The applicants will in each case pay the agreed costs of the respondents fixed in the sum of $500.  It is perhaps unnecessary in those circumstances therefore to certify for the attendance of counsel.  There will be orders in those terms.

AT 9.35 AM THE MATTERS WERE CONCLUDED

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Standing

  • Jurisdiction

  • Costs

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0