Applicant S335 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal
[2005] FCA 1185
•25 AUGUST 2005
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant S335 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1185
APPLICANT S335 OF 2003 v REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL and MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
NSD 2466 of 2003WILCOX J
25 AUGUST 2005
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 2466 of 2003
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
APPLICANT S335 OF 2003
APPLICANTAND:
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENTMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENTJUDGE:
WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER:
25 AUGUST 2005
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Subrule (1) of Order 51A rule 5 not apply to this application.
2. The application for an order nisi be refused.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 2466 of 2003
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
APPLICANT S335 OF 2003
APPLICANTAND:
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENTMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
WILCOX J
DATE:
25 AUGUST 2005
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
WILCOX J:
I have considered the papers filed in this case including the applicant’s submissions. Having considered the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal I do not think that any of the grounds referred to by the applicant is fairly arguable in this case. Accordingly it would be inappropriate to grant an order nisi.
I propose to order that subrule (1) of Order 51A rule 5 not apply to this case and that the application for an order nisi be refused.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Wilcox. Associate:
Dated: 25 August 2005
0
0
0