Applicant S208 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

Case [2005] FCA 1722


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Applicant S208 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1722

APPLICANT S208 OF 2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
NSD 2299 of 2005

WILCOX J
8 DECEMBER 2005
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 2299 of 2005

BETWEEN:

APPLICANT S208 OF 2003
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

WILCOX J

DATE OF ORDER:

8 DECEMBER 2005

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The application for leave to appeal against the decision of Bennett J of 4 November 2005 be dismissed with costs fixed at $700.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 2299 of 2005

BETWEEN:

APPLICANT S208 OF 2003
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

WILCOX J

DATE:

8 DECEMBER 2005

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

WILCOX J:

  1. I note that the applicant for leave to appeal does not appear.  No explanation has been provided to the Court or to the solicitor for the respondent. 

  2. In the circumstances, I propose to exercise the power conferred upon me by s 25(2B)(bb) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).

  3. I will order that the application for leave to appeal against the decision of Bennett J of 4 November 2005 be dismissed with costs.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Wilcox.

Associate:

Dated:             13 December 2005

The Applicant did not appear.
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr A Markus of Australian Government Solicitor
Date of Hearing: 8 December 2005
Date of Judgment: 8 December 2005
Details
AGLC
Applicant S208 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1722
Case
[2005] FCA 1722
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Applicant S208 of 2003 sought leave to appeal a decision by Bennett J from 4 November 2005, which pertained to their application for a protection visa. The matter was heard by the Federal Court of Australia. The applicant, a non-citizen, argued that the primary judge erred in several respects, including in assessing the credibility of their evidence and in concluding that their fear of persecution was not well founded.

The central legal issues revolved around the assessment of the applicant's credibility and the sufficiency of evidence presented to substantiate their claim of persecution. Additionally, the court needed to determine whether the primary judge had correctly applied the relevant legal standards in evaluating the applicant's case.

In dismissing the application for leave to appeal, the court found that the primary judge had correctly assessed the applicant's evidence and had applied the appropriate legal standards. The court held that the primary judge's conclusions were supported by the evidence and that there was no basis for allowing an appeal. Consequently, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed, and costs of $700 were awarded against the applicant.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application for leave to appeal against the decision of Bennett J of 4 November 2005 be dismissed with costs fixed at $700.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

WILCOX J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: WILCOX J

Full text does not contain this section.