APPLICANT S13/2024
v
THE KING
[2024] HCASL 116
S13/2024
The applicant applies for an extension of time to file an application for special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales (Wright J, Yehia and Chen JJ) made on 13 June 2023, upholding an appeal from the District Court of NSW (Traill DCJ).
This case does not raise a question of law of general importance and the administration of justice would not be advanced by a grant of special leave. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant an extension of time.
Special leave to appeal is refused.
Gageler CJ
Gordon J
Edelman J
Steward J
Gleeson J
Jagot J
Beech-Jones J11 April 2024
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Applicant S13/2024 v The King and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] HCASL 116
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file an application for special leave to appeal. The court considered whether the case raised any significant legal questions that warranted the grant of special leave. Additionally, the court examined whether the administration of justice would benefit from allowing the extension.
The court reasoned that the case did not involve any questions of law of general importance and that granting special leave would not serve the interests of justice. The applicant's appeal did not present any novel or significant legal issues that would benefit from higher court scrutiny. As such, the court determined that it would be futile to grant an extension of time. The decision to refuse special leave to appeal was based on the lack of general importance of the legal issues and the absence of any benefit to the administration of justice.
The final orders of the court were to refuse the applicant's application for an extension of time to file an application for special leave to appeal. The judgment was delivered on 11 April 2024, with the majority of the judges concurring in the decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.