Applicant S 124 of 2004 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

Case [2005] FCA 268


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Applicant S 124 of 2004 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 268

APPLICANT S 124 OF 2004 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
NSD 1734 of 2004

ALLSOP J
16 MARCH 2005
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 1734 of 2004

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:

APPLICANT S 124 OF 2004
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

ALLSOP J

DATE OF ORDER:

16 MARCH 2005

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. The application for and extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal be dismissed pursuant s 25 (2B) (bb) (ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
  2. The order of the Court today not be entered before the expiry of 21 days after the sending the respondent to the applicant a letter by registered post informing him of the order of the Court that was made by reason of his non attendance at the hearing today.
  3. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs fixed at a sum of $1,000.00.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 1734 of 2004

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:

APPLICANT S 124 OF 2004
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

ALLSOP J

DATE:

16 MARCH 2005

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. In this matter there has been no appearance by the applicant.  I have read the affidavit of Mr Cramer and am satisfied that the applicant was aware of the hearing today.

  2. The orders I make are as follows:

    1.the application for and extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal be dismissed pursuant s 25 (2B) (bb) (ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).

    2.the order of the Court today not be entered before the expiry of 21 days after the sending the respondent to the applicant a letter by registered post informing him of the order of the Court that was made by reason of his non attendance at the hearing today.

    3.the applicant pay the respondent’s costs fixed at a sum of $1,000.00.

  3. Mr Cramer has asked for the sum in the final order.  I have perused the file and the steps have been taken by the solicitors.  It seems to me that sum is a reasonable amount in all the circumstances and to avoid further costs I make that order.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Allsop.

Associate:

Dated:             22 March 2005

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B Cramer (Slr)
Solicitor for the Respondent: Blake Dawson Waldron
Date of Hearing: 16 March 2005
Date of Judgment: 16 March 2005
Details
AGLC
Applicant S 124 of 2004 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 268
Case
[2005] FCA 268
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the applicant sought an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal against a decision of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs. The matter was before the court to determine the application for an extension of time and the associated costs.

The legal issues before the court were whether the applicant had a valid reason for the delay in filing the notice of appeal and whether an extension of time should be granted under the circumstances. The court had to consider the provisions of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) in determining the matter.

The court found that the applicant had not provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay and therefore dismissed the application for an extension of time. The court also found that the applicant's non-attendance at the hearing was a significant factor in the decision. The court ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs in the sum of $1,000.00.

The court further ordered that the application for an extension of time be dismissed and that the order not be entered before the expiry of 21 days after the respondent had been informed of the court's decision by registered post.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application for and extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal be dismissed pursuant s 25 (2B) (bb) (ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).

2. The order of the Court today not be entered before the expiry of 21 days after the sending the respondent to the applicant a letter by registered post informing him of the order of the Court that was made by reason of his non attendance at the hearing today.

3. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs fixed at a sum of $1,000.00.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

ALLSOP J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: ALLSOP J

Full text does not contain this section.