Applicant P11-2002 v MIMA

Case

[2002] HCATrans 415

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry         
  Sydney  No S211 of 2002

In the matter of -

An application for Writs of Prohibition, Certiorari, Injunction and Mandamus against THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

First Respondent

JOHN VRACHNAS, a Member of the REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent

Ex parte –

APPLICANT S211/2002

Applicant/Prosecutor

GAUDRON J

(In Chambers)

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT SYDNEY ON FRIDAY, 30 AUGUST 2002, AT 9.31 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

MR R. TZANNES:   I appear for the applicant, your Honour.  (of Pryor Tzannes & Wallis)

MR S.B. LLOYD:   I appear for the Minister, may it please the Court.  (instructed by the Australian Government Solicitor)

HER HONOUR:   In this matter I hold a certificate from the Deputy Registrar to the effect that she has been informed by the solicitor for the second respondent, the Refugee Review Tribunal, that that respondent does not seek leave to appear at the hearing of this matter and will abide by any order of the Court save as to costs.

Yes, Mr Tzannes.

MR TZANNES:   Your Honour, consent orders have been settled and agreed upon and we did file in the Court yesterday but I am not sure if you have them in your file.

HER HONOUR:   Yes, I have those.  Very well, that is the document I have, is it, orders 1, 2, 3, and 4; that being no order as to costs.  Very well, I will initial the draft orders and place them with the papers, and the order will be that orders be made in accordance with those draft consent orders, initialled by me and placed in the papers and dated 30 August 2002.

Thank you very much. 

AT 9.33 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Immigration

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Jurisdiction

  • Natural Justice

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Standing

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0