Applicant M52 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
Case
•
[2004] FCAFC 111
•6 MAY 2004
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Applicant M52 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 111
[2004] FCAFC 111
6 MAY 2004
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Federal Court of Australia, the Applicant M52 of 2002 filed an application against the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs. The Applicant sought an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal that had dismissed an application for review of a decision to refuse the Applicant a protection visa. The Applicant also sought leave to appeal the Tribunal's decision.
The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the Applicant had demonstrated sufficient reason for the delay in applying for an extension of time and leave to appeal, and whether the appeal was within the time limits set out in the Migration Act 1958. The court also had to determine whether the Applicant had a valid basis for the appeal and whether the appeal was otherwise incompetent.
The court found that the Applicant had not demonstrated sufficient reason for the delay in applying for an extension of time and leave to appeal. The court held that the Applicant had been aware of the Tribunal's decision on 16 July 2002, and had until 15 August 2002 to lodge an application for an extension of time and leave to appeal. The Applicant did not lodge the application until 16 August 2002, which was one day outside the time limit. The court also found that the Applicant's appeal was otherwise incompetent because it was not filed within the time limits set out in the Migration Act 1958. The court held that the Applicant had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances that would justify an extension of time. The application for an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal and the application for leave to appeal were refused, with costs. The appeal was dismissed as incompetent, with costs.
The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the Applicant had demonstrated sufficient reason for the delay in applying for an extension of time and leave to appeal, and whether the appeal was within the time limits set out in the Migration Act 1958. The court also had to determine whether the Applicant had a valid basis for the appeal and whether the appeal was otherwise incompetent.
The court found that the Applicant had not demonstrated sufficient reason for the delay in applying for an extension of time and leave to appeal. The court held that the Applicant had been aware of the Tribunal's decision on 16 July 2002, and had until 15 August 2002 to lodge an application for an extension of time and leave to appeal. The Applicant did not lodge the application until 16 August 2002, which was one day outside the time limit. The court also found that the Applicant's appeal was otherwise incompetent because it was not filed within the time limits set out in the Migration Act 1958. The court held that the Applicant had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances that would justify an extension of time. The application for an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal and the application for leave to appeal were refused, with costs. The appeal was dismissed as incompetent, with costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration & Refugee Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Refusal of Leave to Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Plaintiff S164/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] HCA 51
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Plaintiff S164/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs
[2018] HCA 51
M52 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration
[2007] FMCA 57
Plaintiff S164/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs
[2018] HCA 51