Applicant A83 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 26
•25 FEBRUARY 2005
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant A83 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 26
APPLICANT A83 of 2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SAD 118 of 2004HELY, GYLES AND ALLSOP JJ
25 FEBRUARY 2005
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
SAD 118 of 2004
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
APPLICANT A 83 of 2003
APPELLANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGES:
HELY, GYLES & ALLSOP JJ
DATE OF ORDER:
25 FEBRUARY 2005
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.the appeal is dismissed pursuant to section 25(2B)(bb) of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth).
2.the appellant pay the respondent’s costs
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
SAD 118 of 2004
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
APPLICANT A 83 of 2003
APPELLANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES:
HELY, GYLES & ALLSOP JJ
DATE:
25 FEBRUARY 2005
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
THE COURT:
This matter was listed for hearing at 2.15p.m. this afternoon. The matter was called on about 2.45p.m. and there was no appearance by the appellant. Letters have been written to the appellant at his latest address both by the Court and by the solicitor for the respondent notifying him that the appeal was to be heard this afternoon at 2.15p.m.
There has been no explanation for his non‑attendance and in those circumstances the appeal is dismissed pursuant to section 25(2B)(bb) of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) with costs.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justices Hely, Gyles & Allsop. Associate:
Dated: 2 March 2005
There was no appearance by the Appellant. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Lloyd Solicitor for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore Date of Hearing: 25 February 2005 Date of Judgment: 25 February 2005
0
0
0