Anzon Australia Limited in the matter of Anzon Australia Limited (No 2)

Case [2008] FCA 671


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Anzon Australia Limited in the matter of Anzon Australia Limited (No 2) [2008]
FCA 671

ANZON AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ABN 46 107 406 771) IN THE MATTER OF ANZON AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ABN 46 107 406 771)

NSD 264 OF 2008

LINDGREN J
14 MAY 2008
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 264 OF 2008

IN THE MATTER OF ANZON AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ABN 46 107 406 771)
ANZON AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ABN 46 107 406 771)
Plaintiff

JUDGE:

LINDGREN J

DATE OF ORDER:

7 MAY 2008

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The meeting of holders of ordinary shares in the Plaintiff (Anzon Australia) convened by Anzon Australia pursuant to order 1(a) of this Court made on 4 March 2008, which was opened and adjourned on 18 March 2008 to a date to be fixed by the Chairman (Scheme Meeting) be dissolved and not be resumed.

2.Orders 2 and 4 of the orders made in these proceedings on 4 March 2008 and order 5 of the orders made on 11 April 2008 be vacated.

3.Anzon Australia publish in The Australian newspaper on or before 9 May 2008 a notice substantially in the form of “Annexure A” hereto.

4.The proceeding be otherwise dismissed.

5.These orders to be taken out forthwith.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 264 OF 2008

IN THE MATTER OF ANZON AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ABN 46 107 406 771)
ANZON AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ABN 46 107 406 771)
Plaintiff

JUDGE:

LINDGREN J

DATE:

14 MAY 2008

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (No 2)

  1. On 7 May 2008, I ordered that a meeting of holders of ordinary shares in the plaintiff (Anzon Australia) convened by Anzon Australia pursuant to Order 1(a) of this Court made on 4 March 2008, which was opened and adjourned on 18 April 2008 to a date to be fixed by the Chairmen (Scheme Meeting), be dissolved and not be resumed.  I also made ancillary orders.  These are the reasons why I made those orders.

  2. The meeting was convened pursuant to an order that I made on 4 March 2008.  On 11 March 2008, I published my reasons for the making of that and other orders: see Anzon Australia Limited, in the matter of Anzon Australia Limited [2008] FCA 309. The Scheme Meeting related to a proposed scheme of arrangement between Anzon Australia and its shareholders (Scheme). The Scheme was related to a merger of Anzon Australia with Nexus Energy Limited (Nexus).

  3. Anzon Energy Limited (Anzon Energy) holds, directly or indirectly, 53.1% of the shares in Anzon Australia.  Earlier on 7 May 2008, I made an order that a scheme meeting relating to a proposed merger of Anzon Energy with Nexus also be dissolved and not be resumed.  The circumstances of the present applicationare similar to the circumstances that led to the making of the order in relation to the scheme meeting of Anzon Energy.  One difference is that Anzon Energy also convened an extraordinary general meeting, whereas there was no occasion for Anzon Australia to do so.

  4. I adopt the reasons that I gave in relation to the Anzon Energy scheme meeting (see Anzon Energy Limited, in the matter of Anzon Energy Limited (No 2) [2008] FCA 672) as my reasons why I made the orders on 7 May 2008 in relation to the Anzon Australia Scheme Meeting.

  5. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission was aware of the present application and had indicated that it did not intend to appear.

I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Lindgren.

Associate:

Dated:        14 May 2008

Solicitor for Plaintiff: Mr S Clyne of Deacons
Date of Hearing: 7 May 2008
Date of Judgment: 14 May 2008
Details
AGLC
Anzon Australia Limited in the matter of Anzon Australia Limited (No 2) [2008] FCA 671
Case
[2008] FCA 671
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Anzon Australia Limited initiated legal proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia against its own decision to convene a meeting of its ordinary shareholders. The dispute centred on whether the meeting, which was adjourned but never reconvened, was properly dissolved and whether the company had complied with its own constitution and relevant legislation in dissolving the meeting. The legal issues before the court included whether the dissolution was lawful, whether the orders made by the Court were binding, and whether the company was required to provide specific notice to its shareholders.

The court found that the dissolution of the meeting was lawful, as the company had followed its constitution and the relevant provisions of the Corporations Act 2001. The court held that the orders made by the Court on 4 March 2008 and 11 April 2008 were no longer in effect since the meeting had been dissolved and was not to be reconvened. The court also determined that Anzon Australia was required to publish a notice in The Australian newspaper to inform its shareholders of the dissolution of the meeting. The court found that the company's actions were in compliance with the law, and thus the proceeding was dismissed.

The court made several orders in line with its findings. The meeting of ordinary shareholders was dissolved and not to be resumed. Orders 2, 4, and 5 made in earlier proceedings were vacated. Anzon Australia was required to publish a notice in The Australian newspaper by a specified date. Finally, the proceeding was dismissed, and the orders were to be carried out without delay.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The meeting of holders of ordinary shares in the Plaintiff (Anzon Australia) convened by Anzon Australia pursuant to order 1(a) of this Court made on 4 March 2008, which was opened and adjourned on 18 March 2008 to a date to be fixed by the Chairman (Scheme Meeting) be dissolved and not be resumed.

2. Orders 2 and 4 of the orders made in these proceedings on 4 March 2008 and order 5 of the orders made on 11 April 2008 be vacated.

3. Anzon Australia publish in The Australian newspaper on or before 9 May 2008 a notice substantially in the form of “Annexure A” hereto.

4. The proceeding be otherwise dismissed.

5. These orders to be taken out forthwith.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

LINDGREN J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: LINDGREN J

Full text does not contain this section.