Anthony Melenewycz v David Patrick Whitfield

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

ANTHONY MELENEWYCZ

v

DAVID PATRICK WHITFIELD & ANOR

[2017] HCASL 25
S237/2016

  1. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales.  Special leave should be refused.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

V.M. Bell

9 February 2017

G.A.A. Nettle

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Anthony Melenewycz v David Patrick Whitfield and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] HCASL 25
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involved a dispute between Anthony Melenewycz and David Patrick Whitfield. The nature of the dispute was not explicitly detailed in the summary, but it can be inferred that it was a legal matter that reached the High Court of Australia. The legal issues the court had to decide were not explicitly outlined in the text, but it is clear that the High Court was reviewing the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The court found that there was no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision made by the lower court. Therefore, the High Court refused to grant special leave to appeal and dismissed the application with costs. The High Court's decision was made pursuant to rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), and the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal the order dismissing the application. The final orders of the court were to dismiss the application with costs, and the decision was made by Justices Bell and Nettle on February 9, 2017.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.