Annual Wage Review 2017–18

Case [2017] FWC 4348


[2017] FWC 4348

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT

Fair Work Act 2009

s.285—Annual wage reviews to be conducted

Annual Wage Review 2017–18

(C2018/1)

JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT

MELBOURNE, 21 AUGUST 2017

TIMETABLE AND RESEARCH PROGRAM

  1. On Friday 11 August 2017, a Statement was issued setting out the draft timetable and draft research program for the Annual Wage Review 2017–18. Submissions and suggestions in relation to the drafts were sought by Friday 18 August 2017. Two submissions were received and published on the Fair Work Commission’s website.

  1. In relation to the draft research program, the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry did ‘not object to the themes’ of the proposed research and provided a number of ‘additional observations’ for each report. These comments will be discussed, along with further consultation in relation to the research program and the contents of the Statistical Report, through the Minimum Wages Research Group. In a submission received on 21 August 2017, the Australian Industry Group supported the proposed research program.

  1. No submission was received seeking a change in the dates proposed in the draft timetable.

  1. The draft timetable and research program, as published on 11 August 2017, are now confirmed.

PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR595499>

Details
AGLC
Annual Wage Review 2017–18 [2017] FWC 4348
Case
[2017] FWC 4348
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission, presided over by Justice Ross, undertook the Annual Wage Review for the 2017–18 period in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009. This review is mandated by the legislation to ensure fair and reasonable wages are set for employees across Australia. The Commission issued a draft timetable and research program on August 11, 2017, inviting submissions to refine these drafts. Submissions were received from the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Australian Industry Group, with both parties providing feedback on the proposed research themes and dates. The Commission confirmed the draft timetable and research program on August 21, 2017, after considering the submissions and consultations.

The primary legal issues before the Commission involved ensuring the proposed timetable and research program for the wage review were comprehensive and balanced. The Commission had to consider the submissions received, assess the appropriateness of the proposed themes and timelines, and make any necessary adjustments to ensure the review process was fair and inclusive. The Commission's role was to set a timetable and research program that would facilitate a thorough analysis of the current economic conditions, wage trends, and other relevant factors impacting minimum wage levels.

Justice Ross, in confirming the draft timetable and research program, acknowledged the submissions received and incorporated relevant feedback into the final decision. The Commission highlighted the importance of a structured and transparent process in conducting the Annual Wage Review. By confirming the draft timetable and research program, the Commission ensured that the review process would proceed as planned, allowing for thorough analysis and consultation before making final decisions on wage adjustments. The Commission's decision reflected a commitment to fairness and due process in setting minimum wages for the coming year.

The Fair Work Commission, through Justice Ross, confirmed the draft timetable and research program for the Annual Wage Review 2017–18. The confirmed program will guide the Commission’s analysis and consultations leading up to the final decisions on wage adjustments. This confirmation ensures a transparent and inclusive process, allowing for comprehensive examination of economic and wage-related factors affecting minimum wages in Australia.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.