Angus v Stevenson - [2002] NSWCA 296

NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL

CITATION: Angus v Stevenson [2002] NSWCA 296

FILE NUMBER(S):
41014/01

HEARING DATE(S): 30 August 2002

JUDGMENT DATE: 30/08/2002

PARTIES:
Michael Joseph ANGUS (Appellant)
Troy Ashley STEVENSON (Respondent)

JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA Santow JA Gzell J

LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court

LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC 103/00

LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Herron DCJ

COUNSEL:
D S Weinberger (Appellant)
G R Petty, SC/ P R Cummings (Respondent)

SOLICITORS:
Gadens Lawyers (Appellant)
Marshall & Partners (Respondent)

CATCHWORDS:
NEGLIGENCE - occupier's liability - causation - glasses overcrowded on tables - risk that glass on such tables may fall to the floor - glass on dance floor - plaintiff fell on glass causing injury - absence of proper and safe system for collection of empty glasses - inadequate implementation of system to collect glasses.

LEGISLATION CITED:

DECISION:
Appeal dismissed with costs.

JUDGMENT:

Angus v Stevenson

LAST UPDATED: 09/09/2002

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Angus v Stevenson and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2002] NSWCA 296
Decision Date: 30 August 2002

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Angus v Stevenson*, the plaintiff, Angus, brought proceedings against the occupier of a hotel, Stevenson, alleging negligence. The dispute arose from injuries sustained by Angus when he fell on a piece of glass on the dance floor of the hotel. Angus contended that the hotel's system for collecting empty glasses was inadequate, creating a foreseeable risk of glasses being present on the dance floor and causing injury.

The central legal issue before the court was whether Stevenson, as the occupier, had breached their duty of care to Angus. This involved determining whether the occupier had failed to implement and adequately enforce a proper and safe system for the collection of empty glasses, and if such failure caused or materially contributed to the presence of glass on the dance floor and Angus's subsequent injury.

The court found that the hotel's practice of allowing glasses to accumulate on tables, particularly in an overcrowded environment, created a foreseeable risk that glasses would fall to the floor. Furthermore, the court determined that the system in place for collecting these glasses was not properly or adequately implemented. This failure to establish and enforce a safe system for glass collection was found to be causative of the presence of glass on the dance floor, leading to the plaintiff's fall and injury.

Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and Stevenson was ordered to pay Angus's costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.