Angliss and Angliss (No 2)

In *Angliss and Angliss (No 2)*, the husband sought interim orders compelling the wife to provide identification to a bank. This identification was necessary to obtain a bank guarantee of approximately $233,000 for the parties' business. The husband contended that failure to secure this guarantee posed a real risk of substantially diminishing the value of the business entities and the matrimonial pool. The wife had also applied for dismissal of the husband's application concerning disclosure.

The court was required to determine whether the wife should be mandatorily enjoined to provide the necessary identification to the bank to facilitate the business's bank guarantee. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the wife had fulfilled her duty of disclosure.

Forrest J reasoned that compelling the wife to provide identification was essential to preserve the value of the matrimonial asset, the business. The contractual obligation to obtain the bank guarantee was critical, and non-compliance carried significant financial risk. The judge ordered that the wife attend the specified bank branch and provide the required identification by a set date. However, the husband's applications relating to disclosure were dismissed, indicating the court found no non-compliance in that regard.