ANDREWS & EMERY (No.2)
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 1852
•9 August 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
ANDREWS & EMERY (No.2) [2017] FCCA 1852
[2017] FCCA 1852
9 August 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of ANDREWS & EMERY (No.2), heard before Judge Neville, the dispute concerned interim arrangements for a child, X, born in 2013. The proceedings involved the parents, identified as the Mother and Father, and the court was tasked with making orders regarding the child's activities pending a final hearing.
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate interim arrangements for the child X, specifically concerning participation in the "PTP program" and any other activities. This involved balancing the welfare of the child with the parents' respective positions and financial capacities.
Judge Neville ordered that the child X shall continue solely in the PTP program and be enrolled in no other activities, pending the final hearing. This order was made conditional upon the Mother paying all associated fees and expenses. The court also scheduled further pre-hearing directions for 18 October 2016.
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate interim arrangements for the child X, specifically concerning participation in the "PTP program" and any other activities. This involved balancing the welfare of the child with the parents' respective positions and financial capacities.
Judge Neville ordered that the child X shall continue solely in the PTP program and be enrolled in no other activities, pending the final hearing. This order was made conditional upon the Mother paying all associated fees and expenses. The court also scheduled further pre-hearing directions for 18 October 2016.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
ANDREWS & EMERY (No.2) [2017] FCCA 1852
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
2
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li
[2013] HCA 18