Andrew Kay v Kenneth Cunningham and David Hookes No. SCGRG 95/762 Judgment No. 5242 Number of Pages 18 Defamation
Case
•
[1995] SASC 5242
•8 September 1995
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Andrew Kay v Kenneth Cunningham and David Hookes No. SCGRG 95/762 Judgment No. 5242 Number of Pages 18 Defamation [1995] SASC 5242
[1995] SASC 5242
8 September 1995
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia, Doyle CJ, Debelle and Nyland JJ heard an appeal brought by Andrew Kay and Kenneth Cunningham against a finding of defamation by the trial judge. The plaintiffs, known for their work in sports broadcasting, had brought an action against the defendant, David Hookes, a news broadcaster, for comments made during a news program which they alleged were defamatory. The Full Court dismissed the appeal. The Court found that the words used by the defendant were capable of being understood as referring to the plaintiffs, and were defamatory. The Court found that the trial judge was correct to conclude that the words were not fair comment, and that the defence of fair comment was vitiated by actual malice on the part of the defendant. Finally, the Court found that the award of damages was not manifestly excessive.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Defamation
Legal Concepts
-
Defamation
-
Breach of Confidence
-
Aggravated & Exemplary Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Whiting v Herald and Weekly Times Pty Limited [2018] NSWDC 372
Cases Citing This Decision
44
Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock
[2007] HCA 60
Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock
[2007] HCA 60
Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock
[2007] HCA 60
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
0
David Syme & Co v Canavan
[1918] HCA 50
Fosse v DPP
[1999] NSWSC 367
Griffith v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
[2010] NSWCA 257