Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Andrew James Munro v Water Administration Ministerial Corporation in the name of the Department of Primary Industries Office of Water [2017] NSWLEC 1494 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 28 January, 30 March, 5 July, 30 November 2016, 16 May and 30 August 2017 Date of orders: 06 September 2017 Decision date: 06 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Adam AC Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: LICENCE APPLICATION UNDER WATER ACT 1912: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
The Water Act 1912Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew James Munro (Applicant)
Water Administration Ministerial Corporation Water Administration Ministerial Corporation (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
Mr N Pragnell, Case Law Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr M Dalla-Pozza, Crown Solicitors (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/161721 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
Pursuant to s.11(4) of the Water Act 1912, the applicant be granted a licence under the Water Act 1912 in respect of the earthen embankment constructed across Nowlands Creek Wards on Mistake Station, Lot 5 and 29 of Deposited Plan 751483 (as shown on a plan retained in the Water NSW office Grafton). This licence is subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” and the supporting documents Annexures B, C and D.
No order as to costs.
……………………….
Acting Commissioner Adam
Annexure A (147 KB, pdf)
Annexure B (899 KB, pdf)
Annexure C (194 KB, pdf)
Annexure D (854 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Andrew James Munro v Water Administration Ministerial Corporation in the name of the Department of Primary Industries Office of Water [2017] NSWLEC 1494
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1494
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the court had to address was whether the Corporation's decisions to alter Munro's water allocation entitlements were lawful, rational, and in accordance with the relevant statutory provisions. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the Corporation had acted within its statutory powers and whether it had adhered to procedural fairness when making the decisions. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the changes to Munro's entitlements were justified under the applicable water legislation.
The court examined the statutory framework governing water allocations and the procedural steps taken by the Corporation. It found that the Corporation had correctly applied the relevant legislation in making its decisions and that the changes to Munro's water allocation entitlements were both rational and justified. The court held that the Corporation had not acted beyond its statutory powers and had followed appropriate procedures. Consequently, the court dismissed Munro's claims and upheld the decisions of the Corporation.
The court ordered that Andrew James Munro pay the costs of the proceeding to the Water Administration Ministerial Corporation, in the name of the Department of Primary Industries Office of Water.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.