and Paul Christie v The Queen - [2016] VSCA 313

SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA

COURT OF APPEAL

S APCR 2016 0024
PAUL CHRISTIE	Applicant
v
THE QUEEN	Respondent

---

JUDGES:	REDLICH, BEACH and KYROU JJA
WHERE HELD:	MELBOURNE
DATE OF HEARING:	25 October 2016
DATE OF JUDGMENT:	13 December 2016
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:	[2016] VSCA 313
JUDGMENT APPEALED FROM:	[2015] VSC 769 (Coghlan JA)

---

CRIMINAL LAW – Murder – Appeal – Whether evidence sufficient to infer murderous intent – Multiple stab wounds to abdomen – Self-defence rejected by jury – Leave to appeal refused – M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; Henderson v The Queen [2016] VSCA 61 applied.

---

APPEARANCES:	Counsel	Solicitors
For the Applicant	Mr J McLoughlin	Victorian Legal Aid
For the Crown	Ms S Flynn	Mr J Cain, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions

REDLICH JA
BEACH JA
KYROU JA:

The applicant was charged with murder following a fight with a visitor to the flat he was staying in. The applicant stabbed the deceased at least eight times in the abdomen. The applicant did not deny stabbing the deceased. At trial he maintained that he had acted in self-defence, and that he did not intend to kill or really seriously injure the deceased.

On 17 November 2015 the applicant was convicted of murder following a nine day trial in the Supreme Court. Following a plea on 15 December 2015, the applicant was sentenced on 22 December 2015 to 17 years’ imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 14 years.

The applicant seeks leave to appeal against his conviction on the sole ground that the verdict is unsafe and not supported by the evidence as it was not open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant intended to kill the deceased or cause him really serious injury when he stabbed him.

On 21 November 2014, the deceased, PK, and his partner, CS, went to KC’s flat where they intended to spend the night. The applicant had been living at KC’s flat for two weeks. He was not at the flat when the deceased and CS arrived. Shortly after they arrived, another friend of KC – FM – arrived at the flat.

Around 10:15 pm, the applicant arrived at the flat and shortly afterwards attempted to have the deceased and CS leave. A fight developed in the lounge/kitchen of the flat and the deceased was stabbed at least eight times in the kitchen. The deceased was taken to hospital, where he died on 2 December 2014.

The prosecution case was that the applicant stabbed the deceased eight times intending to kill or really seriously injure him. Further, the actions of the applicant were not necessary to defend himself from being killed or really seriously injured. The defence case was that he did stab the deceased in self-defence but without the intention to kill or really seriously injure the deceased.

Prior to the charge, the prosecution and defence counsel agreed with the trial judge that manslaughter should be left to the jury.

The prosecution…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read and Paul Christie v The Queen and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2016] VSCA 313
Decision Date: 13 December 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellant, Mr Paul Christie, sought to appeal against his conviction for the murder of his partner, a matter which was determined by the Supreme Court of Victoria. The critical issue in the appeal was whether the evidence presented during the trial was sufficient for a jury to conclude that the appellant acted with murderous intent. The appellant claimed self-defence, but the jury rejected this defence, instead finding him guilty of murder. The appeal focused on whether the evidence was adequate to support the jury's decision.

The court examined the nature of the wounds inflicted upon the victim, which included multiple stab wounds to the abdomen, and assessed whether such injuries were consistent with an act of self-defence. The court also reviewed the appellant's conduct and statements following the incident, in addition to the evidence presented by the prosecution. The legal issues centred on the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the absence of self-defence and to infer murderous intent. The court considered relevant precedents such as M v The Queen and Henderson v The Queen to assist in determining these issues.

After a thorough review of the evidence and applicable legal principles, the court concluded that the jury's decision was supported by sufficient evidence. The court found that the injuries inflicted were not consistent with self-defence, and the appellant's actions post-incident further supported a finding of murderous intent. The court held that the jury was entitled to reject the self-defence plea and convict the appellant of murder. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed, and leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal was refused.

Orders