Amritveer Singh Bhnf Jasbir Singh v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

[2012] HCASL 119

AMRITVEER SINGH BHNF JASBIR SINGH

v

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP

[2012] HCASL 119

M27/2012

1. The applicant, a citizen of India, seeks special leave to appeal against orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (Finn, Dowsett and Bennett JJ) dismissing the applicant's appeal against orders of a single judge of the Federal Court (Marshall J).  Marshall J dismissed the applicant's appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming a decision by a delegate of the Minister to refuse the applicant's application for Australian citizenship.

2. The applicant is a young child who was born in Australia on 14 March 2006.  His parents are citizens of India and they remain in Australia as the holders of bridging visas.  Having been born in Australia, the applicant is deemed also to hold a bridging visa.  Neither the applicant nor his parents have held a permanent visa.

3. In May 2008, the applicant applied for Australian citizenship under s 21 of the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) ("the Citizenship Act"). At that time, the Minister had established policies for determining applications made under s 21 of the Citizenship Act. The policies were contained in a document entitled "Australian Citizenship Instructions 2007" ("the Instructions"). A delegate of the Minister refused the applicant's application and, having regard to the Instructions, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed the delegate's decision.

4. The applicant appealed to the Federal Court on a question of law under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth). The applicant contended, among other things, that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal had erred in applying the Instructions as they were ultra vires and inconsistent with the Citizenship Act. Marshall J dismissed the applicant's appeal. The Full Court of the Federal Court unanimously dismissed the applicant's appeal against the decision of Marshall J.

5. This application raises no question of principle of general public importance which would warrant consideration by this Court, and there is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Full Court.

6. Pursuant to r 41.11.1 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

7          K.M. Hayne

8          15 August 2012

9  S.M. Crennan