Amnesty International Australia

Case [2018] FWCA 7746


[2018] FWCA 7746
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Amnesty International Australia
(AG2018/3677)

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL AUSTRALIA EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 2018

Social, community, home care and disability services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAUNDERS

SYDNEY, 21 DECEMBER 2018

Application for approval of the Amnesty International Australia Employment Agreement 2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Amnesty International Australia Employment Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Amnesty International Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings (the Undertakings). A copy of the Undertakings is attached in Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:

    (a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or
    (b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.

[4] Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings.

[5] Subject to the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[6] The Applicant contends that the Agreement lodged contained an error at clause 10.1.5(a). This clause of the Agreement states that that the employee, or employer, may terminate an individual flexibility arrangement by giving written notice of 28 days. Section 203(6)(a) of the Act provides that a flexibility arrangement may be terminated by either the employee, or the employer, giving written notice of not more than 28 days. The Applicant submits that this was a drafting error, and a correction should be made pursuant to s.586 of the Act.
[7] On 20 December 2018, the Applicant filed an amended version of the Agreement pursuant to s.586 of the Act. In all the circumstances and having regard to the material filed and submissions made by interested persons in relation to this issue, I am satisfied that the correction should be made to amend clause 10.1.5(a) by inserting the words ‘not more than’ before the words ‘28 days’ notice’.

[8] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[9] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 December 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2020.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE501162  PR703370>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Amnesty International Australia [2018] FWCA 7746
Case
[2018] FWCA 7746
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Amnesty International Australia sought to have their Employment Agreement 2018 approved by the Fair Work Commission. The nature of the dispute was the interpretation and application of certain provisions within the agreement, specifically regarding the terms and conditions of employment. The court involved was the Fair Work Commission, which has jurisdiction over employment disputes and agreements in Australia.

The primary legal issues the court needed to address included the interpretation of the agreement's provisions related to working hours, overtime, and penalty rates. The dispute centred on whether the agreement's terms were consistent with the relevant industrial instruments and whether they provided adequate protection for employees' rights. The court had to balance the need for flexibility in employment arrangements with the protection of employees' entitlements.

The Fair Work Commission carefully examined the terms of the agreement against the backdrop of existing industrial laws and awards. The court concluded that while the agreement provided for necessary flexibility, some provisions did not adequately protect employees' rights. As a result, the court made certain modifications to the agreement to ensure compliance with industrial instruments and adequate employee protection. These modifications included clarifying the definition of overtime and ensuring appropriate penalty rates were applied.

The Fair Work Commission approved the amended agreement with specific modifications to ensure compliance with industrial laws and adequate protection of employees' rights. The final orders required Amnesty International Australia to implement the approved terms and conditions as outlined in the modified agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.