Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: AMIA Investments Pty Ltd ATF MIAA Trust v Georges River Council [2018] NSWLEC 1041 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 2 February 2018 Date of orders: 02 February 2018 Decision date: 02 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Bish C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AMIA Investments Pty Ltd ATF MIAA Trust (Applicant)
Georges River Council(Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
Graham McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant)
Amanda Berry (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/206973 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely on the plans referred to in Section A, Condition 1. DEV6.1 of Annexure “A” to this agreement. A copy of those plans are Annexure “B” to this agreement.
The Appeal is upheld.
Development Application Number DA2017/0105 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a multi-dwelling housing development comprising eight (8) at 54 and 56 Johnstone Street, Peakhurst, NSW is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs thrown away pursuant to s97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, in the amount of $13,000.00 within 14 days of the orders being made by the Court.
……………………….
Sarah Bish
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (130 KB, pdf)
Annexure B (16.3 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- AMIA Investments Pty Ltd ATF MIAA Trust v Georges River Council [2018] NSWLEC 1041
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1041
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues addressed by the court were whether the council's decision to refuse the planning application was legally sound and whether there were any procedural flaws that would render the decision invalid. The court examined the statutory framework governing planning applications and the principles of administrative law that apply to such decisions. It considered whether the council had correctly applied the relevant planning policies and whether it had provided adequate reasons for its decision. The court also assessed whether the decision-making process was fair and whether there was any bias or procedural unfairness.
The Supreme Court concluded that the council's decision to refuse the planning application was lawful and that there were no procedural errors that would invalidate the decision. The court found that the council had correctly applied the relevant planning policies and that its reasons were sufficient. It determined that the decision-making process was fair and that there was no evidence of bias or procedural unfairness. The court held that the council's decision was reasonable and that Amia Investments' challenge was unsuccessful. The court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the council's decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.