Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 9 July 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 133


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 9 JULY 2014

AMENDED

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart  
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Tasmanian Perpetual Trustee Limited as Executor of the Estate of Basil Wilfred Reynolds
v
Marshall & Ors

LAUNCESTON

No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 9 July 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 133
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 133
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's amended law lists for Wednesday, 9 July 2014, detail a range of proceedings to be heard in Hobart, with specific focus on the criminal and civil jurisdictions. Among the cases listed, one notable case involves Stephen Roy Standage, identified as part-heard. The court proceedings will be held in Court 8, located at Salamanca Place in Hobart, and will commence at 9:15 a.m. Another case in the civil jurisdiction involves Tasmanian Perpetual Trustee Limited as Executor of the Estate of Basil Wilfred Reynolds, who is suing Marshall and others. This case is scheduled for hearing at 10:00 a.m. in Court 3, also located at Salamanca Place.

The legal issues in these cases likely pertain to the procedural aspects of the criminal trial and the substantive issues in the civil case. For the criminal case involving Standage, the court must determine the procedural correctness of the trial process, ensuring compliance with legal standards and fairness. In the civil case, the court will examine the validity of the claims made by the executor of the estate against the defendants, focusing on matters such as the estate's administration, asset distribution, and any potential liabilities of the defendants.

The court's reasoning in these cases will be guided by statutory provisions and common law principles applicable to criminal and civil proceedings. The outcome will depend on the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by the parties involved. The criminal trial's procedural fairness and adherence to legal standards will be paramount, while the civil case will hinge on the merits of the claims and the applicable legal framework governing estate administration and litigation.

The final orders of the court will reflect the determinations made in these proceedings. In the criminal case, the court may issue rulings on procedural matters or, if the trial is completed, deliver a verdict and sentence. In the civil case, the court will likely issue a judgment that addresses the claims made, potentially including orders for payment, distribution of assets, or other relief deemed appropriate by the court.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.