Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 3 July 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 3 JULY 2013

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Voir Dire
Stephen Roy Standage

4.15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Garry Scott Sullivan

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Mark Leigh Freeman

2.00 p.m.
For Legal Argument
Phillip Mark Law
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
Ivan Mercer
v
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Hearing
Quarmby
v
Oakley

Quarmby
v
Harper

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Wednesday, 3 July 2013, detail a range of criminal and civil cases scheduled for hearing. The cases span from bail applications to sentencing submissions and legal arguments, demonstrating the variety of legal matters the court is set to address. The hearings are scheduled across different courts and times, reflecting the court's capacity to manage multiple cases concurrently.

The legal issues presented in these cases encompass a variety of criminal and civil matters, including bail applications, sentencing submissions, and disputes involving insurance and property. The court is required to decide on the admissibility of evidence, the granting of bail, the appropriate sentencing for convicted individuals, and the resolution of contractual and property disputes. Each case presents unique legal questions that the court must address based on the evidence and arguments presented by the parties involved.

In the reasoning and outcome of these cases, the court will consider the evidence and arguments presented by the parties. For criminal cases, the court will evaluate the evidence to determine whether the accused should be granted bail or sentenced appropriately. In civil cases, the court will consider the merits of the arguments and the evidence to resolve disputes between the parties. The court's decisions will be based on a thorough analysis of the law and the facts of each case, aiming to deliver just outcomes that are consistent with legal principles.

The final orders of the court will be communicated to the parties involved, detailing the court's decisions on the matters presented. These orders will include rulings on bail applications, sentencing decisions, and resolutions of civil disputes. The court's decisions are expected to provide clarity and resolution to the legal issues raised in each case, ensuring that the parties receive a definitive outcome based on the law and the evidence presented.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established