Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 19 August 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 19 AUGUST 2015

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Denis Ross Tringrove
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Application to Review an Order Suspending Sentence

Daniel Lee Upton

For Application to Review a Community Service Order

Bodie Kane Savage

For Sentence

JSWR

Joshua-Ty Laredo

For Facts and Sentence

Dean Phillip Braslin

2:15 p.m.

For Sentence

Leah Lesley Cannon

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Civil Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
In Court
For Application
Daniel Johnston Russell
V
Hongfei Chu

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Lokendra Singh

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involves a compilation of cases listed for hearing on Wednesday, 19 August 2015, before various courts within the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The cases span both criminal and civil jurisdictions, with hearings scheduled in Hobart and Launceston. The listing includes cases for the Court of Criminal Appeal, Criminal Jurisdiction, and Civil Jurisdiction. Some cases are scheduled for sentence, review of orders, and directions hearings.

The legal issues presented in these cases are varied, encompassing criminal appeals, applications to review orders, sentencing decisions, and civil applications. The Court of Criminal Appeal case involves a challenge to an order suspending a sentence. Other cases involve applications to review community service orders, sentencing decisions, and a civil application. The court must address the legal merits of each case, ensuring that the decisions align with statutory and common law principles.

The reasoning and outcome of each case will depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented. The Court of Criminal Appeal will consider the grounds of appeal and the appropriateness of the sentence. In criminal cases, the court will assess the evidence and legal arguments to determine the appropriate sentence or review the legality of the orders. In the civil case, the court will evaluate the application based on the evidence and legal principles pertinent to the case.

The final orders will be determined by the court based on its findings and legal reasoning. For the Court of Criminal Appeal, the outcome may result in the affirmation, modification, or overturning of the sentence or order in question. In criminal cases, the court will issue sentences or review the orders as deemed appropriate. In the civil case, the court will either grant or deny the application based on the merits of the arguments presented.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established