AMENDED SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 16 APRIL 2014
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Marcus John Hindrum
v
Sergeant Richard Adam Lane
Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15 p.m.
For Mention
Jamie Gregory McCrossen
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
John Nicholas Etchell
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Gerard Vincent Poulson
For Bail Application
Kyle Ronald Street
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm
For Decision via Video Link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
JCS
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Wendy Young
v
Joan Miriam Young
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 am
For Application
In the Matter of Section 206G of the Corporations Act and in the Matter of an Application by John Eugene Gay
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
Chamber Matter
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm
For Sentence via video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
John Nicholas Etchell
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Decision via video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
JCS
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 16 April 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 73
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 73
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine whether the conduct of Sergeant Richard Adam Lane constituted an offence under the criminal law. The case involved allegations against the defendant, Sergeant Lane, and the court was required to assess the evidence presented and apply the relevant legal standards to reach a verdict.
The court, in its reasoning, carefully considered the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties. Justice TENNENT evaluated the credibility of witnesses, the admissibility of evidence, and the applicable legal principles. Following the deliberation, the court rendered its decision, which was communicated to the parties and the public. The outcome of the case was determined in accordance with the established legal framework and the facts presented during the hearing.
The final orders of the court were communicated to the parties involved in the case. The specific details of the court's decision, including any penalties or directives, were outlined in the judgment. The case concluded with the court's determination, which addressed the allegations and provided a resolution based on the evidence and legal principles applied during the hearing.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.