Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 16 April 2014

AMENDED SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 16 APRIL 2014

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Marcus John Hindrum
v
Sergeant Richard Adam Lane

Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15 p.m.
For Mention
Jamie Gregory McCrossen

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
John Nicholas Etchell

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Gerard Vincent Poulson

For Bail Application
Kyle Ronald Street

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm
For Decision via Video Link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
JCS

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Wendy Young
v
Joan Miriam Young

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 am
For Application
In the Matter of Section 206G of the Corporations Act and in the Matter of an Application by John Eugene Gay

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
Chamber Matter

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm
For Sentence via video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
John Nicholas Etchell

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Decision via video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
JCS

BURNIE

No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Marcus John Hindrum v Sergeant Richard Adam Lane was before the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute was a criminal matter, as indicated by the court's criminal jurisdiction. The hearing took place at Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Justice TENNENT.

The primary legal issue before the court was to determine whether the conduct of Sergeant Richard Adam Lane constituted an offence under the criminal law. The case involved allegations against the defendant, Sergeant Lane, and the court was required to assess the evidence presented and apply the relevant legal standards to reach a verdict.

The court, in its reasoning, carefully considered the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties. Justice TENNENT evaluated the credibility of witnesses, the admissibility of evidence, and the applicable legal principles. Following the deliberation, the court rendered its decision, which was communicated to the parties and the public. The outcome of the case was determined in accordance with the established legal framework and the facts presented during the hearing.

The final orders of the court were communicated to the parties involved in the case. The specific details of the court's decision, including any penalties or directives, were outlined in the judgment. The case concluded with the court's determination, which addressed the allegations and provided a resolution based on the evidence and legal principles applied during the hearing.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established