Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 28 October 2014

AMENDED SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 28 OCTOBER 2014

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
Jamie Peter Smart
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Adrian Raymond Nattey
Jason Charles Dare

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial

Gregory Patrick Kotynia-English
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
10:00a.m.
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Tye Matthew Curtain

4:00p.m.
For Mention
Dylan Vincent Phillips

In Court as in Chambers
4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Khristeen Taylor

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00pm for Sentence
Asador Hinsta

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania on Tuesday, 28 October 2014, detail various criminal and civil matters scheduled for hearing. The list includes part-heard trials, mentions, and bail applications across different courts in Hobart and Launceston. Notable cases include the part-heard trial of Jamie Peter Smart and Rhys Louis Gardner, and the trial of Gregory Patrick Kotynia-English, both under criminal jurisdiction. Additionally, there are mentions scheduled for Adrian Raymond Nattey and Jason Charles Dare, as well as a bail application for Khristeen Taylor. In Launceston, a sentencing hearing is scheduled for Asador Hinsta.

The legal issues in these cases likely revolve around the criminal proceedings, including the admissibility of evidence, the interpretation of criminal statutes, and the appropriate sentences for the convicted parties. The court would need to determine whether the prosecution has met its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, consider any mitigating or aggravating factors, and ensure that the trials are conducted fairly and in accordance with legal standards.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, through its various judges and associates, would be responsible for overseeing these proceedings. The court's reasoning and outcome would depend on the specific facts and evidence presented in each case, as well as the applicable laws. For instance, in bail applications, the court would assess whether the accused poses a risk to the community or is likely to abscond if released.

The final orders of the court would be communicated through the amended law lists or subsequent court documents. These orders would include details such as the outcomes of the trials, the sentences handed down, and the decisions on bail applications. The court’s decisions would be binding and could potentially be appealed to higher courts if the parties involved deemed the outcomes unjust.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established