Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 24 June 2014

AMENDED SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 24 JUNE 2014

HOBART

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Christopher Wayne Wakefield
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Patreen Michelle Belbin

For Plea in Mitigation
Jacob Roger Dorloff

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
JCS

In Court as In Chambers
4:00pm for Bail Application
Daniel John Rock

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial (part-heard)
Nicole Margaret Bruce

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Leonie Rose King
Stephen Augustine Mulcahy

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter involves a listing of cases before the Supreme Court of Tasmania, with hearings scheduled in Hobart and Launceston on June 24, 2014. The cases span both criminal and civil jurisdictions, reflecting the broad scope of issues that the Supreme Court handles. The listed cases include trials, sentences, and bail applications, indicating a mix of ongoing trials and post-trial proceedings.

The legal issues that the court was required to address encompass a range of criminal and civil matters. For the criminal cases, the court needed to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendants, assess appropriate sentences, and rule on bail applications. The civil cases likely involved disputes that required the court to interpret and apply relevant laws to resolve the issues at hand. Given the diverse nature of the cases, the court's decisions would have implications for both the defendants and the broader legal community.

The reasoning and outcome of the cases would depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented in each case. For criminal cases, the court would have considered the evidence presented, the applicable legal standards, and the principles of justice and fairness. In civil cases, the court would have evaluated the evidence and legal arguments to make decisions that resolved the disputes. The detailed outcomes of each case would have been communicated to the parties involved, and any appeals would have been subject to further judicial review.

The final orders of the court would have been documented in the court's records and communicated to the parties involved. The outcomes would have provided resolutions to the legal issues presented in each case, with potential implications for the parties and the broader legal system.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established