Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 16 June 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 16 JUNE 2015

AMENDED LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Derek Michael Crosswell
v
The State of Tasmania

Tu Ai Lin
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Mark William Eather
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention by video-link
Mark Giovanof
Luke Rogers

For Mention
Stuart Alexander Ferguson
Benjamin Angus Shield
Natasha Lee Scott
Patrick Reginald Baillie

For Legal Argument
Leah Lesley Cannon

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Travis Paul Burden

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Denis Ross Tringrove
Robin Glen Fahey
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Luke James Reader
Christina Vernessa Watson

4:15pm For Directions Hearing
JWM

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Mark Adrian Wicks

For Trial
Stephen Matthew Biggs
(Part-Heard)

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, sitting at various locations on Tuesday, 16 June 2015, had a range of criminal and civil cases on its list. Derek Michael Crosswell and Tu Ai Lin both had appeals against their criminal convictions before the Court of Criminal Appeal. Mark William Eather and Denis Ross Tringrove, alongside Robin Glen Fahey, had their trials before Justice Porter and Justice PEARCE respectively. Stephen Matthew Biggs' trial was also listed, but only partially heard. Other matters included mentions, legal arguments, and sentencing hearings.

The legal issues before the court ranged from appeals against conviction and sentence to trials on various criminal charges. The Court of Criminal Appeal had to determine whether there were any errors in the original trials that warranted overturning the convictions or sentences. The trials themselves required the court to assess the evidence presented and the credibility of witnesses to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused.

The court's reasoning and outcomes for each case are not detailed in the provided excerpt. However, the court would have considered the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties before making its decisions. The outcomes would be communicated through judgments or orders, which are not included in this list. The final orders, including any sentences or directions, would be communicated to the parties involved and recorded in the court's official records.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established